Per complaint from Scott Ribe. Based on wording suggestion from Tom Lane.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/
1956E806-1468-4417-9A9D-
235AE1D5FE1A@elevated-dev.com
Backpatch-through: 11, where pg_jit_available() was added
<row>
<entry><literal><function>pg_jit_available()</function></literal></entry>
<entry><type>boolean</type></entry>
- <entry>is <acronym>JIT</acronym> compilation available in this session
- (see <xref linkend="jit"/>)? Returns <literal>false</literal> if <xref
- linkend="guc-jit"/> is set to false.</entry>
+ <entry>is a <acronym>JIT</acronym> compiler extension available
+ (see <xref linkend="jit"/>) and the <xref linkend="guc-jit"/>
+ configuration parameter set to <literal>on</literal>.</entry>
</row>
<row>