The:
```
if (shared_per_thread > 0 && threads > 0)
shared_per_thread /= threads;
```
Code was accidentally moved to inside the else scope. This doesn't
match how it was previously (before
af992e7abd).
This patch fixes that by putting the division after the `else` block.
(cherry picked from commit
084fb31bc2c5f95ae0b9e6df4d3cf0ff43471ede)
}
else
{
- intel_bug_no_cache_info:
+intel_bug_no_cache_info:
/* Assume that all logical threads share the highest cache
level. */
- threads = ((cpu_features->cpuid[COMMON_CPUID_INDEX_1].ebx >> 16)
- & 0xff);
-
- /* Cap usage of highest cache level to the number of supported
- threads. */
- if (shared_per_thread > 0 && threads > 0)
- shared_per_thread /= threads;
+ threads
+ = ((cpu_features->cpuid[COMMON_CPUID_INDEX_1].ebx
+ >> 16) & 0xff);
}
+
+ /* Cap usage of highest cache level to the number of supported
+ threads. */
+ if (shared_per_thread > 0 && threads > 0)
+ shared_per_thread /= threads;
}
/* Account for non-inclusive L2 and L3 caches. */