-C Change\sthe\sANALYZE\scommand\sso\sthat\sit\swill\saccept\san\sindex\sname\sas\sits\nargument\sand\sonly\sreanalyze\sthat\sone\sindex.\s\sA\squick\ssmoke-test\sworks.\nNeed\sto\sstudy\sthe\simplications\sto\sthe\squery\splanner\sand\stest\scorner\scases.
-D 2011-03-31T02:03:28.435
+C Test\scases\sfor\sANALYZE-index.
+D 2011-04-01T14:04:36.013
F Makefile.arm-wince-mingw32ce-gcc d6df77f1f48d690bd73162294bbba7f59507c72f
F Makefile.in 27701a1653595a1f2187dc61c8117e00a6c1d50f
F Makefile.linux-gcc 91d710bdc4998cb015f39edf3cb314ec4f4d7e23
F test/analyze4.test 757b37875cf9bb528d46f74497bc789c88365045
F test/analyze5.test adc89b92fc9fee5ca1cb0bc8512f3206ad0fe5aa
F test/analyze6.test c125622a813325bba1b4999040ddc213773c2290
+F test/analyze7.test 06405dd3d2a3101de14270da508016a59254873b
F test/async.test ad4ba51b77cd118911a3fe1356b0809da9c108c3
F test/async2.test bf5e2ca2c96763b4cba3d016249ad7259a5603b6
F test/async3.test 93edaa9122f498e56ea98c36c72abc407f4fb11e
F tool/speedtest8.c 2902c46588c40b55661e471d7a86e4dd71a18224
F tool/speedtest8inst1.c 293327bc76823f473684d589a8160bde1f52c14e
F tool/vdbe-compress.tcl d70ea6d8a19e3571d7ab8c9b75cba86d1173ff0f
-P a84f7711949ea3885b0e36e48118d2c76a8a5b82
-R 2733d2c2848c13b668e60a30cb1bc35d
-T *bgcolor * #ab8eb2
-T *branch * analyze-idx
-T *sym-analyze-idx *
-T -sym-trunk *
+P c8f9edd962442cbdd848c48f1a134557ab8c6ef5
+R 1095a96b12af8399e13f3de1ef24664d
U drh
-Z 6f592daac956cab070466c419bbb51de
+Z a7b9c4ff9eb44077c37bf72bf0e8f05e
--- /dev/null
+# 2011 April 1
+#
+# The author disclaims copyright to this source code. In place of
+# a legal notice, here is a blessing:
+#
+# May you do good and not evil.
+# May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others.
+# May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
+#
+#***********************************************************************
+# This file implements regression tests for SQLite library.
+# This file implements tests for the ANALYZE command when an idnex
+# name is given as the argument.
+#
+
+set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
+source $testdir/tester.tcl
+
+# There is nothing to test if ANALYZE is disable for this build.
+#
+ifcapable {!analyze} {
+ finish_test
+ return
+}
+
+# Generate some test data
+#
+do_test analyze7-1.0 {
+ execsql {
+ CREATE TABLE sequence(x INTEGER PRIMARY KEY);
+ INSERT INTO sequence VALUES(1);
+ INSERT INTO sequence VALUES(2);
+ INSERT INTO sequence SELECT x+2 FROM sequence;
+ INSERT INTO sequence SELECT x+4 FROM sequence;
+ INSERT INTO sequence SELECT x+8 FROM sequence;
+ INSERT INTO sequence SELECT x+16 FROM sequence;
+ INSERT INTO sequence SELECT x+32 FROM sequence;
+ INSERT INTO sequence SELECT x+64 FROM sequence;
+ INSERT INTO sequence SELECT x+128 FROM sequence;
+ INSERT INTO sequence SELECT x+256 FROM sequence;
+ CREATE TABLE t1(a,b,c,d);
+ CREATE INDEX t1a ON t1(a);
+ CREATE INDEX t1b ON t1(b);
+ CREATE INDEX t1cd ON t1(c,d);
+ INSERT INTO t1 SELECT x, x, x/100, x FROM sequence;
+ EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a=123;
+ }
+} {0 0 0 {SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX t1a (a=?) (~10 rows)}}
+do_test analyze7-1.1 {
+ execsql {EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE b=123;}
+} {0 0 0 {SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX t1b (b=?) (~10 rows)}}
+do_test analyze7-1.2 {
+ execsql {EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE c=2;}
+} {0 0 0 {SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX t1cd (c=?) (~10 rows)}}
+
+# Run an analyze on one of the three indices. Verify that this
+# effects the row-count estimate on the one query that uses that
+# one index.
+#
+do_test analyze7-2.0 {
+ execsql {ANALYZE t1a;}
+ db cache flush
+ execsql {EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a=123;}
+} {0 0 0 {SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX t1a (a=?) (~1 rows)}}
+do_test analyze7-2.1 {
+ execsql {EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE b=123;}
+} {0 0 0 {SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX t1b (b=?) (~10 rows)}}
+do_test analyze7-2.2 {
+ execsql {EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE c=2;}
+} {0 0 0 {SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX t1cd (c=?) (~10 rows)}}
+
+# Verify that since the query planner now things that t1a is more
+# selective than t1b, it prefers to use t1a.
+#
+do_test analyze7-2.3 {
+ execsql {EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a=123 AND b=123}
+} {0 0 0 {SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX t1a (a=?) (~1 rows)}}
+
+# Run an analysis on another of the three indices. Verify that this
+# new analysis works and does not disrupt the previous analysis.
+#
+do_test analyze7-3.0 {
+ execsql {ANALYZE t1cd;}
+ db cache flush;
+ execsql {EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a=123;}
+} {0 0 0 {SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX t1a (a=?) (~1 rows)}}
+do_test analyze7-3.1 {
+ execsql {EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE b=123;}
+} {0 0 0 {SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX t1b (b=?) (~10 rows)}}
+do_test analyze7-3.2 {
+ execsql {EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE c=2;}
+} {0 0 0 {SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX t1cd (c=?) (~102 rows)}}
+do_test analyze7-3.3 {
+ execsql {EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a=123 AND b=123}
+} {0 0 0 {SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX t1a (a=?) (~1 rows)}}
+do_test analyze7-3.4 {
+ execsql {EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE c=123 AND b=123}
+} {0 0 0 {SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX t1b (b=?) (~2 rows)}}
+do_test analyze7-3.5 {
+ execsql {EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a=123 AND c=123}
+} {0 0 0 {SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX t1a (a=?) (~1 rows)}}
+do_test analyze7-3.6 {
+ execsql {EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE c=123 AND d=123 AND b=123}
+} {0 0 0 {SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX t1cd (c=? AND d=?) (~1 rows)}}
+
+finish_test