The net effect of the deeper checks is to raise implicit function decls
on modern compilers.
These checks appear to have been added ~20 years ago, relating to an
unverifiable claim about HP-UX. Autoconf support for the platform has
grown in leaps and bounds since.
It didn't cause a real problem here, but when investigating a FP this
came up. No evidence has been identified that this was actually broken
in the past, and there is no evidence that this is necessary now.
`-Werror=implicit-function-declarations` is enabled for both checks;
without a working prototype they will both fail regardless. In the
second case there will in fact never be a working prototype and
therefore it will always fail unconditionally.
`AC_CHECK_FUNCS` does effectively the same thing as the removed checks,
except it actually defines a dummy prototype to see if it links.
If `AC_CHECK_FUNCS` is broken on a given platform we have bigger
problems than trying to build cURL. This should also be faster.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/932827
Reviewed-By: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz93@gmail.com>
Closes #13830
snprintf \
utime \
utimes \
-],[
-],[
- func="$ac_func"
- eval skipcheck=\$skipcheck_$func
- if test "x$skipcheck" != "xyes"; then
- AC_MSG_CHECKING([deeper for $func])
- AC_LINK_IFELSE([
- AC_LANG_PROGRAM([[
- ]],[[
- $func ();
- ]])
- ],[
- AC_MSG_RESULT([yes])
- eval "ac_cv_func_$func=yes"
- AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(XC_SH_TR_CPP([HAVE_$func]), [1],
- [Define to 1 if you have the $func function.])
- ],[
- AC_MSG_RESULT([but still no])
- ])
- fi
])
dnl On Android, the only way to know if fseeko can be used is to see if it is