--- /dev/null
+From 9899d11f654474d2d54ea52ceaa2a1f4db3abd68 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
+Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 20:48:00 +0100
+Subject: ptrace: ensure arch_ptrace/ptrace_request can never race with SIGKILL
+
+From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
+
+commit 9899d11f654474d2d54ea52ceaa2a1f4db3abd68 upstream.
+
+putreg() assumes that the tracee is not running and pt_regs_access() can
+safely play with its stack. However a killed tracee can return from
+ptrace_stop() to the low-level asm code and do RESTORE_REST, this means
+that debugger can actually read/modify the kernel stack until the tracee
+does SAVE_REST again.
+
+set_task_blockstep() can race with SIGKILL too and in some sense this
+race is even worse, the very fact the tracee can be woken up breaks the
+logic.
+
+As Linus suggested we can clear TASK_WAKEKILL around the arch_ptrace()
+call, this ensures that nobody can ever wakeup the tracee while the
+debugger looks at it. Not only this fixes the mentioned problems, we
+can do some cleanups/simplifications in arch_ptrace() paths.
+
+Probably ptrace_unfreeze_traced() needs more callers, for example it
+makes sense to make the tracee killable for oom-killer before
+access_process_vm().
+
+While at it, add the comment into may_ptrace_stop() to explain why
+ptrace_stop() still can't rely on SIGKILL and signal_pending_state().
+
+Reported-by: Salman Qazi <sqazi@google.com>
+Reported-by: Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>
+Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
+Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
+Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ kernel/ptrace.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
+ kernel/signal.c | 5 ++++
+ 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/kernel/ptrace.c
++++ b/kernel/ptrace.c
+@@ -122,6 +122,40 @@ void __ptrace_unlink(struct task_struct
+ spin_unlock(&child->sighand->siglock);
+ }
+
++/* Ensure that nothing can wake it up, even SIGKILL */
++static bool ptrace_freeze_traced(struct task_struct *task)
++{
++ bool ret = false;
++
++ /* Lockless, nobody but us can set this flag */
++ if (task->jobctl & JOBCTL_LISTENING)
++ return ret;
++
++ spin_lock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock);
++ if (task_is_traced(task) && !__fatal_signal_pending(task)) {
++ task->state = __TASK_TRACED;
++ ret = true;
++ }
++ spin_unlock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock);
++
++ return ret;
++}
++
++static void ptrace_unfreeze_traced(struct task_struct *task)
++{
++ if (task->state != __TASK_TRACED)
++ return;
++
++ WARN_ON(!task->ptrace || task->parent != current);
++
++ spin_lock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock);
++ if (__fatal_signal_pending(task))
++ wake_up_state(task, __TASK_TRACED);
++ else
++ task->state = TASK_TRACED;
++ spin_unlock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock);
++}
++
+ /**
+ * ptrace_check_attach - check whether ptracee is ready for ptrace operation
+ * @child: ptracee to check for
+@@ -151,24 +185,29 @@ int ptrace_check_attach(struct task_stru
+ * be changed by us so it's not changing right after this.
+ */
+ read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+- if ((child->ptrace & PT_PTRACED) && child->parent == current) {
++ if (child->ptrace && child->parent == current) {
++ WARN_ON(child->state == __TASK_TRACED);
+ /*
+ * child->sighand can't be NULL, release_task()
+ * does ptrace_unlink() before __exit_signal().
+ */
+- spin_lock_irq(&child->sighand->siglock);
+- WARN_ON_ONCE(task_is_stopped(child));
+- if (ignore_state || (task_is_traced(child) &&
+- !(child->jobctl & JOBCTL_LISTENING)))
++ if (ignore_state || ptrace_freeze_traced(child))
+ ret = 0;
+- spin_unlock_irq(&child->sighand->siglock);
+ }
+ read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+
+- if (!ret && !ignore_state)
+- ret = wait_task_inactive(child, TASK_TRACED) ? 0 : -ESRCH;
++ if (!ret && !ignore_state) {
++ if (!wait_task_inactive(child, __TASK_TRACED)) {
++ /*
++ * This can only happen if may_ptrace_stop() fails and
++ * ptrace_stop() changes ->state back to TASK_RUNNING,
++ * so we should not worry about leaking __TASK_TRACED.
++ */
++ WARN_ON(child->state == __TASK_TRACED);
++ ret = -ESRCH;
++ }
++ }
+
+- /* All systems go.. */
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+@@ -891,6 +930,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(ptrace, long, request, l
+ goto out_put_task_struct;
+
+ ret = arch_ptrace(child, request, addr, data);
++ if (ret || request != PTRACE_DETACH)
++ ptrace_unfreeze_traced(child);
+
+ out_put_task_struct:
+ put_task_struct(child);
+@@ -1030,8 +1071,11 @@ asmlinkage long compat_sys_ptrace(compat
+
+ ret = ptrace_check_attach(child, request == PTRACE_KILL ||
+ request == PTRACE_INTERRUPT);
+- if (!ret)
++ if (!ret) {
+ ret = compat_arch_ptrace(child, request, addr, data);
++ if (ret || request != PTRACE_DETACH)
++ ptrace_unfreeze_traced(child);
++ }
+
+ out_put_task_struct:
+ put_task_struct(child);
+--- a/kernel/signal.c
++++ b/kernel/signal.c
+@@ -1802,6 +1802,10 @@ static inline int may_ptrace_stop(void)
+ * If SIGKILL was already sent before the caller unlocked
+ * ->siglock we must see ->core_state != NULL. Otherwise it
+ * is safe to enter schedule().
++ *
++ * This is almost outdated, a task with the pending SIGKILL can't
++ * block in TASK_TRACED. But PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT can be reported
++ * after SIGKILL was already dequeued.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(current->mm->core_state) &&
+ unlikely(current->mm == current->parent->mm))
+@@ -1927,6 +1931,7 @@ static void ptrace_stop(int exit_code, i
+ if (gstop_done)
+ do_notify_parent_cldstop(current, false, why);
+
++ /* tasklist protects us from ptrace_freeze_traced() */
+ __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
+ if (clear_code)
+ current->exit_code = 0;
--- /dev/null
+From 910ffdb18a6408e14febbb6e4b6840fd2c928c82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
+Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 20:47:41 +0100
+Subject: ptrace: introduce signal_wake_up_state() and ptrace_signal_wake_up()
+
+From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
+
+commit 910ffdb18a6408e14febbb6e4b6840fd2c928c82 upstream.
+
+Cleanup and preparation for the next change.
+
+signal_wake_up(resume => true) is overused. None of ptrace/jctl callers
+actually want to wakeup a TASK_WAKEKILL task, but they can't specify the
+necessary mask.
+
+Turn signal_wake_up() into signal_wake_up_state(state), reintroduce
+signal_wake_up() as a trivial helper, and add ptrace_signal_wake_up()
+which adds __TASK_TRACED.
+
+This way ptrace_signal_wake_up() can work "inside" ptrace_request()
+even if the tracee doesn't have the TASK_WAKEKILL bit set.
+
+Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
+Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ include/linux/sched.h | 11 ++++++++++-
+ kernel/ptrace.c | 8 ++++----
+ kernel/signal.c | 14 ++++----------
+ 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/include/linux/sched.h
++++ b/include/linux/sched.h
+@@ -2695,7 +2695,16 @@ static inline void thread_group_cputime_
+ extern void recalc_sigpending_and_wake(struct task_struct *t);
+ extern void recalc_sigpending(void);
+
+-extern void signal_wake_up(struct task_struct *t, int resume_stopped);
++extern void signal_wake_up_state(struct task_struct *t, unsigned int state);
++
++static inline void signal_wake_up(struct task_struct *t, bool resume)
++{
++ signal_wake_up_state(t, resume ? TASK_WAKEKILL : 0);
++}
++static inline void ptrace_signal_wake_up(struct task_struct *t, bool resume)
++{
++ signal_wake_up_state(t, resume ? __TASK_TRACED : 0);
++}
+
+ /*
+ * Wrappers for p->thread_info->cpu access. No-op on UP.
+--- a/kernel/ptrace.c
++++ b/kernel/ptrace.c
+@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ void __ptrace_unlink(struct task_struct
+ * TASK_KILLABLE sleeps.
+ */
+ if (child->jobctl & JOBCTL_STOP_PENDING || task_is_traced(child))
+- signal_wake_up(child, task_is_traced(child));
++ ptrace_signal_wake_up(child, true);
+
+ spin_unlock(&child->sighand->siglock);
+ }
+@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ static int ptrace_attach(struct task_str
+ */
+ if (task_is_stopped(task) &&
+ task_set_jobctl_pending(task, JOBCTL_TRAP_STOP | JOBCTL_TRAPPING))
+- signal_wake_up(task, 1);
++ signal_wake_up_state(task, __TASK_STOPPED);
+
+ spin_unlock(&task->sighand->siglock);
+
+@@ -728,7 +728,7 @@ int ptrace_request(struct task_struct *c
+ * tracee into STOP.
+ */
+ if (likely(task_set_jobctl_pending(child, JOBCTL_TRAP_STOP)))
+- signal_wake_up(child, child->jobctl & JOBCTL_LISTENING);
++ ptrace_signal_wake_up(child, child->jobctl & JOBCTL_LISTENING);
+
+ unlock_task_sighand(child, &flags);
+ ret = 0;
+@@ -754,7 +754,7 @@ int ptrace_request(struct task_struct *c
+ * start of this trap and now. Trigger re-trap.
+ */
+ if (child->jobctl & JOBCTL_TRAP_NOTIFY)
+- signal_wake_up(child, true);
++ ptrace_signal_wake_up(child, true);
+ ret = 0;
+ }
+ unlock_task_sighand(child, &flags);
+--- a/kernel/signal.c
++++ b/kernel/signal.c
+@@ -677,23 +677,17 @@ int dequeue_signal(struct task_struct *t
+ * No need to set need_resched since signal event passing
+ * goes through ->blocked
+ */
+-void signal_wake_up(struct task_struct *t, int resume)
++void signal_wake_up_state(struct task_struct *t, unsigned int state)
+ {
+- unsigned int mask;
+-
+ set_tsk_thread_flag(t, TIF_SIGPENDING);
+-
+ /*
+- * For SIGKILL, we want to wake it up in the stopped/traced/killable
++ * TASK_WAKEKILL also means wake it up in the stopped/traced/killable
+ * case. We don't check t->state here because there is a race with it
+ * executing another processor and just now entering stopped state.
+ * By using wake_up_state, we ensure the process will wake up and
+ * handle its death signal.
+ */
+- mask = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
+- if (resume)
+- mask |= TASK_WAKEKILL;
+- if (!wake_up_state(t, mask))
++ if (!wake_up_state(t, state | TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE))
+ kick_process(t);
+ }
+
+@@ -842,7 +836,7 @@ static void ptrace_trap_notify(struct ta
+ assert_spin_locked(&t->sighand->siglock);
+
+ task_set_jobctl_pending(t, JOBCTL_TRAP_NOTIFY);
+- signal_wake_up(t, t->jobctl & JOBCTL_LISTENING);
++ ptrace_signal_wake_up(t, t->jobctl & JOBCTL_LISTENING);
+ }
+
+ /*
libata-ahci-add-support-for-enmotus-bobcat-device.patch
ftrace-be-first-to-run-code-modification-on-modules.patch
evm-checking-if-removexattr-is-not-a-null.patch
+ptrace-introduce-signal_wake_up_state-and-ptrace_signal_wake_up.patch
+ptrace-ensure-arch_ptrace-ptrace_request-can-never-race-with-sigkill.patch
+wake_up_process-should-be-never-used-to-wakeup-a-task_stopped-traced-task.patch
--- /dev/null
+From 9067ac85d533651b98c2ff903182a20cbb361fcb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
+Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 20:48:17 +0100
+Subject: wake_up_process() should be never used to wakeup a TASK_STOPPED/TRACED task
+
+From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
+
+commit 9067ac85d533651b98c2ff903182a20cbb361fcb upstream.
+
+wake_up_process() should never wakeup a TASK_STOPPED/TRACED task.
+Change it to use TASK_NORMAL and add the WARN_ON().
+
+TASK_ALL has no other users, probably can be killed.
+
+Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
+Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ kernel/sched/core.c | 3 ++-
+ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
++++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
+@@ -1688,7 +1688,8 @@ out:
+ */
+ int wake_up_process(struct task_struct *p)
+ {
+- return try_to_wake_up(p, TASK_ALL, 0);
++ WARN_ON(task_is_stopped_or_traced(p));
++ return try_to_wake_up(p, TASK_NORMAL, 0);
+ }
+ EXPORT_SYMBOL(wake_up_process);
+
projects / thirdparty / kernel / stable-queue.git / commitdiff
