--- /dev/null
+From 8508f4cba308f785b2fd4b8c38849c117b407297 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
+Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 18:40:50 +0000
+Subject: serial: amba-pl011: Make sure we initialize the port.lock spinlock
+
+From: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
+
+commit 8508f4cba308f785b2fd4b8c38849c117b407297 upstream.
+
+Valentine reported seeing:
+
+[ 3.626638] INFO: trying to register non-static key.
+[ 3.626639] the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
+[ 3.626640] turning off the locking correctness validator.
+[ 3.626644] CPU: 7 PID: 51 Comm: kworker/7:1 Not tainted 5.7.0-rc2-00115-g8c2e9790f196 #116
+[ 3.626646] Hardware name: HiKey960 (DT)
+[ 3.626656] Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func
+[ 3.632476] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Optimal transfer size 8192 bytes not a multiple of physical block size (16384 bytes)
+[ 3.640220] Call trace:
+[ 3.640225] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1b8
+[ 3.640227] show_stack+0x20/0x30
+[ 3.640230] dump_stack+0xec/0x158
+[ 3.640234] register_lock_class+0x598/0x5c0
+[ 3.640235] __lock_acquire+0x80/0x16c0
+[ 3.640236] lock_acquire+0xf4/0x4a0
+[ 3.640241] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x70/0xa8
+[ 3.640245] uart_add_one_port+0x388/0x4b8
+[ 3.640248] pl011_register_port+0x70/0xf0
+[ 3.640250] pl011_probe+0x184/0x1b8
+[ 3.640254] amba_probe+0xdc/0x180
+[ 3.640256] really_probe+0xe0/0x338
+[ 3.640257] driver_probe_device+0x60/0xf8
+[ 3.640259] __device_attach_driver+0x8c/0xd0
+[ 3.640260] bus_for_each_drv+0x84/0xd8
+[ 3.640261] __device_attach+0xe4/0x140
+[ 3.640263] device_initial_probe+0x1c/0x28
+[ 3.640265] bus_probe_device+0xa4/0xb0
+[ 3.640266] deferred_probe_work_func+0x7c/0xb8
+[ 3.640269] process_one_work+0x2c0/0x768
+[ 3.640271] worker_thread+0x4c/0x498
+[ 3.640272] kthread+0x14c/0x158
+[ 3.640275] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x1c
+
+Which seems to be due to the fact that after allocating the uap
+structure, nothing initializes the spinlock.
+
+Its a little confusing, as uart_port_spin_lock_init() is one
+place where the lock is supposed to be initialized, but it has
+an exception for the case where the port is a console.
+
+This makes it seem like a deeper fix is needed to properly
+register the console, but I'm not sure what that entails, and
+Andy suggested that this approach is less invasive.
+
+Thus, this patch resolves the issue by initializing the spinlock
+in the driver, and resolves the resulting warning.
+
+Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
+Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
+Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>
+Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
+Reported-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
+Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
+Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
+Reviewed-and-tested-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
+Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200428184050.6501-1-john.stultz@linaro.org
+Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c | 1 +
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
+
+--- a/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
++++ b/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
+@@ -2575,6 +2575,7 @@ static int pl011_setup_port(struct devic
+ uap->port.has_sysrq = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SERIAL_AMBA_PL011_CONSOLE);
+ uap->port.flags = UPF_BOOT_AUTOCONF;
+ uap->port.line = index;
++ spin_lock_init(&uap->port.lock);
+
+ amba_ports[index] = uap;
+