--- /dev/null
+From 4eb1782eaa9fa1c224ad1fa0d13a9f09c3ab2d80 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
+Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 17:43:14 +0100
+Subject: recordmcount.pl: fix typo in s390 mcount regex
+
+From: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
+
+commit 4eb1782eaa9fa1c224ad1fa0d13a9f09c3ab2d80 upstream.
+
+Commit 85bf17b28f97 ("recordmcount.pl: look for jgnop instruction as well
+as bcrl on s390") added a new alternative mnemonic for the existing brcl
+instruction. This is required for the combination old gcc version (pre 9.0)
+and binutils since version 2.37.
+However at the same time this commit introduced a typo, replacing brcl with
+bcrl. As a result no mcount locations are detected anymore with old gcc
+versions (pre 9.0) and binutils before version 2.37.
+Fix this by using the correct mnemonic again.
+
+Reported-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
+Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
+Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
+Fixes: 85bf17b28f97 ("recordmcount.pl: look for jgnop instruction as well as bcrl on s390")
+Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/alpine.LSU.2.21.2112230949520.19849@pobox.suse.cz
+Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ scripts/recordmcount.pl | 2 +-
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- a/scripts/recordmcount.pl
++++ b/scripts/recordmcount.pl
+@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ if ($arch eq "x86_64") {
+
+ } elsif ($arch eq "s390" && $bits == 64) {
+ if ($cc =~ /-DCC_USING_HOTPATCH/) {
+- $mcount_regex = "^\\s*([0-9a-fA-F]+):\\s*c0 04 00 00 00 00\\s*(bcrl\\s*0,|jgnop\\s*)[0-9a-f]+ <([^\+]*)>\$";
++ $mcount_regex = "^\\s*([0-9a-fA-F]+):\\s*c0 04 00 00 00 00\\s*(brcl\\s*0,|jgnop\\s*)[0-9a-f]+ <([^\+]*)>\$";
+ $mcount_adjust = 0;
+ } else {
+ $mcount_regex = "^\\s*([0-9a-fA-F]+):\\s*R_390_(PC|PLT)32DBL\\s+_mcount\\+0x2\$";
--- /dev/null
+From 732bc2ff080c447f8524f40c970c481f5da6eed3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
+Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2021 07:07:39 -0800
+Subject: selinux: initialize proto variable in selinux_ip_postroute_compat()
+
+From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
+
+commit 732bc2ff080c447f8524f40c970c481f5da6eed3 upstream.
+
+Clang static analysis reports this warning
+
+hooks.c:5765:6: warning: 4th function call argument is an uninitialized
+ value
+ if (selinux_xfrm_postroute_last(sksec->sid, skb, &ad, proto))
+ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+selinux_parse_skb() can return ok without setting proto. The later call
+to selinux_xfrm_postroute_last() does an early check of proto and can
+return ok if the garbage proto value matches. So initialize proto.
+
+Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
+Fixes: eef9b41622f2 ("selinux: cleanup selinux_xfrm_sock_rcv_skb() and selinux_xfrm_postroute_last()")
+Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
+[PM: typo/spelling and checkpatch.pl description fixes]
+Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ security/selinux/hooks.c | 2 +-
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
++++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
+@@ -4974,7 +4974,7 @@ static unsigned int selinux_ip_postroute
+ struct common_audit_data ad;
+ struct lsm_network_audit net = {0,};
+ char *addrp;
+- u8 proto;
++ u8 proto = 0;
+
+ if (sk == NULL)
+ return NF_ACCEPT;