These are equivalent on glibc, while musl does not know loff_t.
In the long run, it would be preferable to enable transparent LFS so
that off64_t could be replaced by off_t.
Signed-off-by: Felix Janda <felix.janda@posteo.de>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
#define EFSCORRUPTED EUCLEAN /* Filesystem is corrupted */
#define EFSBADCRC EBADMSG /* Bad CRC detected */
-typedef loff_t xfs_off_t;
+typedef off64_t xfs_off_t;
typedef __uint64_t xfs_ino_t;
typedef __uint32_t xfs_dev_t;
typedef __int64_t xfs_daddr_t;