+++ /dev/null
-From 5039b170369d22613ebc07e81410891f52280a45 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 16:05:23 -0700
-Subject: proc/vmcore: fix possible deadlock on concurrent mmap and read
-
-From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
-
-commit 5039b170369d22613ebc07e81410891f52280a45 upstream.
-
-Lockdep noticed that there is chance for a deadlock if we have concurrent
-mmap, concurrent read, and the addition/removal of a callback.
-
-As nicely explained by Boqun:
- "Lockdep warned about the above sequences because rw_semaphore is a
- fair read-write lock, and the following can cause a deadlock:
-
- TASK 1 TASK 2 TASK 3
- ====== ====== ======
- down_write(mmap_lock);
- down_read(vmcore_cb_rwsem)
- down_write(vmcore_cb_rwsem); // blocked
- down_read(vmcore_cb_rwsem); // cannot get the lock because of the fairness
- down_read(mmap_lock); // blocked
-
- IOW, a reader can block another read if there is a writer queued by
- the second reader and the lock is fair"
-
-To fix this, convert to srcu to make this deadlock impossible. We need
-srcu as our callbacks can sleep. With this change, I cannot trigger any
-lockdep warnings.
-
- ======================================================
- WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
- 5.17.0-0.rc0.20220117git0c947b893d69.68.test.fc36.x86_64 #1 Not tainted
- ------------------------------------------------------
- makedumpfile/542 is trying to acquire lock:
- ffffffff832d2eb8 (vmcore_cb_rwsem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: mmap_vmcore+0x340/0x580
-
- but task is already holding lock:
- ffff8880af226438 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0x84/0x150
-
- which lock already depends on the new lock.
-
- the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-
- -> #1 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}:
- lock_acquire+0xc3/0x1a0
- __might_fault+0x4e/0x70
- _copy_to_user+0x1f/0x90
- __copy_oldmem_page+0x72/0xc0
- read_from_oldmem+0x77/0x1e0
- read_vmcore+0x2c2/0x310
- proc_reg_read+0x47/0xa0
- vfs_read+0x101/0x340
- __x64_sys_pread64+0x5d/0xa0
- do_syscall_64+0x43/0x90
- entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
-
- -> #0 (vmcore_cb_rwsem){.+.+}-{3:3}:
- validate_chain+0x9f4/0x2670
- __lock_acquire+0x8f7/0xbc0
- lock_acquire+0xc3/0x1a0
- down_read+0x4a/0x140
- mmap_vmcore+0x340/0x580
- proc_reg_mmap+0x3e/0x90
- mmap_region+0x504/0x880
- do_mmap+0x38a/0x520
- vm_mmap_pgoff+0xc1/0x150
- ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x178/0x200
- do_syscall_64+0x43/0x90
- entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
-
- other info that might help us debug this:
-
- Possible unsafe locking scenario:
-
- CPU0 CPU1
- ---- ----
- lock(&mm->mmap_lock#2);
- lock(vmcore_cb_rwsem);
- lock(&mm->mmap_lock#2);
- lock(vmcore_cb_rwsem);
-
- *** DEADLOCK ***
-
- 1 lock held by makedumpfile/542:
- #0: ffff8880af226438 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0x84/0x150
-
- stack backtrace:
- CPU: 0 PID: 542 Comm: makedumpfile Not tainted 5.17.0-0.rc0.20220117git0c947b893d69.68.test.fc36.x86_64 #1
- Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 0.5.1 01/01/2011
- Call Trace:
- __lock_acquire+0x8f7/0xbc0
- lock_acquire+0xc3/0x1a0
- down_read+0x4a/0x140
- mmap_vmcore+0x340/0x580
- proc_reg_mmap+0x3e/0x90
- mmap_region+0x504/0x880
- do_mmap+0x38a/0x520
- vm_mmap_pgoff+0xc1/0x150
- ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x178/0x200
- do_syscall_64+0x43/0x90
-
-Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220119193417.100385-1-david@redhat.com
-Fixes: cc5f2704c934 ("proc/vmcore: convert oldmem_pfn_is_ram callback to more generic vmcore callbacks")
-Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
-Reported-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
-Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
-Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
-Cc: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
-Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
-Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
-Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
-Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
-Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
-Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
----
- fs/proc/vmcore.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
-
---- a/fs/proc/vmcore.c
-+++ b/fs/proc/vmcore.c
-@@ -62,7 +62,8 @@ core_param(novmcoredd, vmcoredd_disabled
- /* Device Dump Size */
- static size_t vmcoredd_orig_sz;
-
--static DECLARE_RWSEM(vmcore_cb_rwsem);
-+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(vmcore_cb_lock);
-+DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU(vmcore_cb_srcu);
- /* List of registered vmcore callbacks. */
- static LIST_HEAD(vmcore_cb_list);
- /* Whether the vmcore has been opened once. */
-@@ -70,8 +71,8 @@ static bool vmcore_opened;
-
- void register_vmcore_cb(struct vmcore_cb *cb)
- {
-- down_write(&vmcore_cb_rwsem);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cb->next);
-+ spin_lock(&vmcore_cb_lock);
- list_add_tail(&cb->next, &vmcore_cb_list);
- /*
- * Registering a vmcore callback after the vmcore was opened is
-@@ -79,14 +80,14 @@ void register_vmcore_cb(struct vmcore_cb
- */
- if (vmcore_opened)
- pr_warn_once("Unexpected vmcore callback registration\n");
-- up_write(&vmcore_cb_rwsem);
-+ spin_unlock(&vmcore_cb_lock);
- }
- EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(register_vmcore_cb);
-
- void unregister_vmcore_cb(struct vmcore_cb *cb)
- {
-- down_write(&vmcore_cb_rwsem);
-- list_del(&cb->next);
-+ spin_lock(&vmcore_cb_lock);
-+ list_del_rcu(&cb->next);
- /*
- * Unregistering a vmcore callback after the vmcore was opened is
- * very unusual (e.g., forced driver removal), but we cannot stop
-@@ -94,7 +95,9 @@ void unregister_vmcore_cb(struct vmcore_
- */
- if (vmcore_opened)
- pr_warn_once("Unexpected vmcore callback unregistration\n");
-- up_write(&vmcore_cb_rwsem);
-+ spin_unlock(&vmcore_cb_lock);
-+
-+ synchronize_srcu(&vmcore_cb_srcu);
- }
- EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unregister_vmcore_cb);
-
-@@ -103,9 +106,8 @@ static bool pfn_is_ram(unsigned long pfn
- struct vmcore_cb *cb;
- bool ret = true;
-
-- lockdep_assert_held_read(&vmcore_cb_rwsem);
--
-- list_for_each_entry(cb, &vmcore_cb_list, next) {
-+ list_for_each_entry_srcu(cb, &vmcore_cb_list, next,
-+ srcu_read_lock_held(&vmcore_cb_srcu)) {
- if (unlikely(!cb->pfn_is_ram))
- continue;
- ret = cb->pfn_is_ram(cb, pfn);
-@@ -118,9 +120,9 @@ static bool pfn_is_ram(unsigned long pfn
-
- static int open_vmcore(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
- {
-- down_read(&vmcore_cb_rwsem);
-+ spin_lock(&vmcore_cb_lock);
- vmcore_opened = true;
-- up_read(&vmcore_cb_rwsem);
-+ spin_unlock(&vmcore_cb_lock);
-
- return 0;
- }
-@@ -133,6 +135,7 @@ ssize_t read_from_oldmem(char *buf, size
- unsigned long pfn, offset;
- size_t nr_bytes;
- ssize_t read = 0, tmp;
-+ int idx;
-
- if (!count)
- return 0;
-@@ -140,7 +143,7 @@ ssize_t read_from_oldmem(char *buf, size
- offset = (unsigned long)(*ppos % PAGE_SIZE);
- pfn = (unsigned long)(*ppos / PAGE_SIZE);
-
-- down_read(&vmcore_cb_rwsem);
-+ idx = srcu_read_lock(&vmcore_cb_srcu);
- do {
- if (count > (PAGE_SIZE - offset))
- nr_bytes = PAGE_SIZE - offset;
-@@ -165,7 +168,7 @@ ssize_t read_from_oldmem(char *buf, size
- offset, userbuf);
- }
- if (tmp < 0) {
-- up_read(&vmcore_cb_rwsem);
-+ srcu_read_unlock(&vmcore_cb_srcu, idx);
- return tmp;
- }
-
-@@ -176,8 +179,8 @@ ssize_t read_from_oldmem(char *buf, size
- ++pfn;
- offset = 0;
- } while (count);
-+ srcu_read_unlock(&vmcore_cb_srcu, idx);
-
-- up_read(&vmcore_cb_rwsem);
- return read;
- }
-
-@@ -568,18 +571,18 @@ static int vmcore_remap_oldmem_pfn(struc
- unsigned long from, unsigned long pfn,
- unsigned long size, pgprot_t prot)
- {
-- int ret;
-+ int ret, idx;
-
- /*
-- * Check if oldmem_pfn_is_ram was registered to avoid
-- * looping over all pages without a reason.
-+ * Check if a callback was registered to avoid looping over all
-+ * pages without a reason.
- */
-- down_read(&vmcore_cb_rwsem);
-+ idx = srcu_read_lock(&vmcore_cb_srcu);
- if (!list_empty(&vmcore_cb_list))
- ret = remap_oldmem_pfn_checked(vma, from, pfn, size, prot);
- else
- ret = remap_oldmem_pfn_range(vma, from, pfn, size, prot);
-- up_read(&vmcore_cb_rwsem);
-+ srcu_read_unlock(&vmcore_cb_srcu, idx);
- return ret;
- }
-