FWIW, I happen to like R-T-C not because I don't trust my peers

(because I do trust you all) but because it forces me to get up
off my butt and actually DO the reviewing sometimes.  With C-T-R
it's too easy for people (read: me) to get lazy, and if this
happens to enough people, which it often does, we end up with no
review at all.  People make mistakes... no stopping that.  But
R-T-C just encourages a little extra diligence on everyone's
part IMO.

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/APACHE_2_0_BRANCH@98835 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS
index 73584bc6a6a52ae758204921ad3b7004798a5ed3..c6e96df30074845d13b7ef8e86bbbdaa58419f41 100644 (file)
--- a/STATUS
+++ b/STATUS
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 APACHE 2.0 STATUS:                                              -*-text-*-
-Last modified at [$Date: 2003/02/27 15:28:17 $]
+Last modified at [$Date: 2003/02/28 01:24:53 $]
 
 Release:
 
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ CURRENT VOTES:
     * Develop in Review-Then-Commit or Commit-Then-Review mode 
       on APACHE_2_0_BRANCH (no vetoes, this is a straight vote.)
        R-T-C:   trawick, wrowe, jerenkrantz, stoddard, rederpj, striker, nd,
-                gregames(lazy consensus OK for mainline)
+                gregames(lazy consensus OK for mainline), jwoolley
        Abstain: 
        C-T-R:   BrianP, aaron, jim, gstein, bnicholes