selinux: fix style issues in security/selinux/include/xfrm.h

As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean".  My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.

Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>

diff --git a/security/selinux/include/xfrm.h b/security/selinux/include/xfrm.h
index c758398602007157aecb2fd6e48e8dfec3515dd0..de485556ae29ca2f878119fdb63f9877ae3ed340 100644 (file)
--- a/security/selinux/include/xfrm.h
+++ b/security/selinux/include/xfrm.h
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
  * Author : Trent Jaeger, <jaegert@us.ibm.com>
  * Updated : Venkat Yekkirala, <vyekkirala@TrustedCS.com>
  */
+
 #ifndef _SELINUX_XFRM_H_
 #define _SELINUX_XFRM_H_
 
@@ -13,8 +14,7 @@
 #include <net/xfrm.h>
 
 int selinux_xfrm_policy_alloc(struct xfrm_sec_ctx **ctxp,
-                             struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *uctx,
-                             gfp_t gfp);
+                             struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *uctx, gfp_t gfp);
 int selinux_xfrm_policy_clone(struct xfrm_sec_ctx *old_ctx,
                              struct xfrm_sec_ctx **new_ctxp);
 void selinux_xfrm_policy_free(struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx);