3.14-stable patches

added patches:
	mm-check-if-section-present-during-memory-block-registering.patch
	x86-mm-initialize-pmd_idx-in-page_table_range_init_count.patch

diff --git a/queue-3.14/mm-check-if-section-present-during-memory-block-registering.patch b/queue-3.14/mm-check-if-section-present-during-memory-block-registering.patch
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..634e82f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/queue-3.14/mm-check-if-section-present-during-memory-block-registering.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+From 04697858d89e4bf2650364f8d6956e2554e8ef88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
+Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 15:42:39 -0700
+Subject: mm: check if section present during memory block registering
+
+From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
+
+commit 04697858d89e4bf2650364f8d6956e2554e8ef88 upstream.
+
+Tony Luck found on his setup, if memory block size 512M will cause crash
+during booting.
+
+  BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffea0074000020
+  IP: get_nid_for_pfn+0x17/0x40
+  PGD 128ffcb067 PUD 128ffc9067 PMD 0
+  Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
+  Modules linked in:
+  CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.2.0-rc8 #1
+  ...
+  Call Trace:
+     ? register_mem_sect_under_node+0x66/0xe0
+     register_one_node+0x17b/0x240
+     ? pci_iommu_alloc+0x6e/0x6e
+     topology_init+0x3c/0x95
+     do_one_initcall+0xcd/0x1f0
+
+The system has non continuous RAM address:
+ BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000001300000000-0x0000001cffffffff] usable
+ BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000001d70000000-0x0000001ec7ffefff] usable
+ BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000001f00000000-0x0000002bffffffff] usable
+ BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000002c18000000-0x0000002d6fffefff] usable
+ BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000002e00000000-0x00000039ffffffff] usable
+
+So there are start sections in memory block not present.  For example:
+
+    memory block : [0x2c18000000, 0x2c20000000) 512M
+
+first three sections are not present.
+
+The current register_mem_sect_under_node() assume first section is
+present, but memory block section number range [start_section_nr,
+end_section_nr] would include not present section.
+
+For arch that support vmemmap, we don't setup memmap for struct page
+area within not present sections area.
+
+So skip the pfn range that belong to absent section.
+
+[akpm@linux-foundation.org: simplification]
+[rientjes@google.com: more simplification]
+Fixes: bdee237c0343 ("x86: mm: Use 2GB memory block size on large memory x86-64 systems")
+Fixes: 982792c782ef ("x86, mm: probe memory block size for generic x86 64bit")
+Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
+Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
+Reported-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
+Tested-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
+Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
+Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
+Tested-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
+Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
+Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ drivers/base/node.c |   10 ++++++++++
+ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
+
+--- a/drivers/base/node.c
++++ b/drivers/base/node.c
+@@ -399,6 +399,16 @@ int register_mem_sect_under_node(struct
+       for (pfn = sect_start_pfn; pfn <= sect_end_pfn; pfn++) {
+               int page_nid;
+ 
++              /*
++               * memory block could have several absent sections from start.
++               * skip pfn range from absent section
++               */
++              if (!pfn_present(pfn)) {
++                      pfn = round_down(pfn + PAGES_PER_SECTION,
++                                       PAGES_PER_SECTION) - 1;
++                      continue;
++              }
++
+               page_nid = get_nid_for_pfn(pfn);
+               if (page_nid < 0)
+                       continue;

diff --git a/queue-3.14/series b/queue-3.14/series
index a738d4aa9ba0d4cfc5d9cb8d383cfadc04a6c276..a39110d667324e7a30ca85a75e930e5b1df35f90 100644 (file)
--- a/queue-3.14/series
+++ b/queue-3.14/series
@@ -17,3 +17,5 @@ powerpc-rtas-introduce-rtas_get_sensor_fast-for-irq-handlers.patch
 powerpc-mm-recompute-hash-value-after-a-failed-update.patch
 cifs-fix-type-confusion-in-copy-offload-ioctl.patch
 add-radeon-suspend-resume-quirk-for-hp-compaq-dc5750.patch
+mm-check-if-section-present-during-memory-block-registering.patch
+x86-mm-initialize-pmd_idx-in-page_table_range_init_count.patch

diff --git a/queue-3.14/x86-mm-initialize-pmd_idx-in-page_table_range_init_count.patch b/queue-3.14/x86-mm-initialize-pmd_idx-in-page_table_range_init_count.patch
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..d2c7797
--- /dev/null
+++ b/queue-3.14/x86-mm-initialize-pmd_idx-in-page_table_range_init_count.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+From 9962eea9e55f797f05f20ba6448929cab2a9f018 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Minfei Huang <mnfhuang@gmail.com>
+Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 20:18:42 +0800
+Subject: x86/mm: Initialize pmd_idx in page_table_range_init_count()
+
+From: Minfei Huang <mnfhuang@gmail.com>
+
+commit 9962eea9e55f797f05f20ba6448929cab2a9f018 upstream.
+
+The variable pmd_idx is not initialized for the first iteration of the
+for loop.
+
+Assign the proper value which indexes the start address.
+
+Fixes: 719272c45b82 'x86, mm: only call early_ioremap_page_table_range_init() once'
+Signed-off-by: Minfei Huang <mnfhuang@gmail.com>
+Cc: tony.luck@intel.com
+Cc: wangnan0@huawei.com
+Cc: david.vrabel@citrix.com
+Reviewed-by: yinghai@kernel.org
+Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1436703522-29552-1-git-send-email-mhuang@redhat.com
+Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ arch/x86/mm/init_32.c |    1 +
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
+
+--- a/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
++++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
+@@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ page_table_range_init_count(unsigned lon
+ 
+       vaddr = start;
+       pgd_idx = pgd_index(vaddr);
++      pmd_idx = pmd_index(vaddr);
+ 
+       for ( ; (pgd_idx < PTRS_PER_PGD) && (vaddr != end); pgd_idx++) {
+               for (; (pmd_idx < PTRS_PER_PMD) && (vaddr != end);