+++ /dev/null
-From 3629c40d9d559912ba1e25950e4ae8763f899d89 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
-Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 09:17:37 +0800
-Subject: can: raw: fix receiver memory leak
-
-From: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@huawei.com>
-
-[ Upstream commit ee8b94c8510ce64afe0b87ef548d23e00915fb10 ]
-
-Got kmemleak errors with the following ltp can_filter testcase:
-
-for ((i=1; i<=100; i++))
-do
- ./can_filter &
- sleep 0.1
-done
-
-==============================================================
-[<00000000db4a4943>] can_rx_register+0x147/0x360 [can]
-[<00000000a289549d>] raw_setsockopt+0x5ef/0x853 [can_raw]
-[<000000006d3d9ebd>] __sys_setsockopt+0x173/0x2c0
-[<00000000407dbfec>] __x64_sys_setsockopt+0x61/0x70
-[<00000000fd468496>] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
-[<00000000b7e47d51>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xc6
-
-It's a bug in the concurrent scenario of unregister_netdevice_many()
-and raw_release() as following:
-
- cpu0 cpu1
-unregister_netdevice_many(can_dev)
- unlist_netdevice(can_dev) // dev_get_by_index() return NULL after this
- net_set_todo(can_dev)
- raw_release(can_socket)
- dev = dev_get_by_index(, ro->ifindex); // dev == NULL
- if (dev) { // receivers in dev_rcv_lists not free because dev is NULL
- raw_disable_allfilters(, dev, );
- dev_put(dev);
- }
- ...
- ro->bound = 0;
- ...
-
-call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_UNREGISTER, )
- raw_notify(, NETDEV_UNREGISTER, )
- if (ro->bound) // invalid because ro->bound has been set 0
- raw_disable_allfilters(, dev, ); // receivers in dev_rcv_lists will never be freed
-
-Add a net_device pointer member in struct raw_sock to record bound
-can_dev, and use rtnl_lock to serialize raw_socket members between
-raw_bind(), raw_release(), raw_setsockopt() and raw_notify(). Use
-ro->dev to decide whether to free receivers in dev_rcv_lists.
-
-Fixes: 8d0caedb7596 ("can: bcm/raw/isotp: use per module netdevice notifier")
-Reviewed-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
-Acked-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
-Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@huawei.com>
-Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230711011737.1969582-1-william.xuanziyang@huawei.com
-Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
-Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
----
- net/can/raw.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/net/can/raw.c b/net/can/raw.c
-index 7105fa4824e4b..afa76ce0bf608 100644
---- a/net/can/raw.c
-+++ b/net/can/raw.c
-@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ struct raw_sock {
- struct sock sk;
- int bound;
- int ifindex;
-+ struct net_device *dev;
- struct list_head notifier;
- int loopback;
- int recv_own_msgs;
-@@ -275,7 +276,7 @@ static void raw_notify(struct raw_sock *ro, unsigned long msg,
- if (!net_eq(dev_net(dev), sock_net(sk)))
- return;
-
-- if (ro->ifindex != dev->ifindex)
-+ if (ro->dev != dev)
- return;
-
- switch (msg) {
-@@ -290,6 +291,7 @@ static void raw_notify(struct raw_sock *ro, unsigned long msg,
-
- ro->ifindex = 0;
- ro->bound = 0;
-+ ro->dev = NULL;
- ro->count = 0;
- release_sock(sk);
-
-@@ -335,6 +337,7 @@ static int raw_init(struct sock *sk)
-
- ro->bound = 0;
- ro->ifindex = 0;
-+ ro->dev = NULL;
-
- /* set default filter to single entry dfilter */
- ro->dfilter.can_id = 0;
-@@ -382,19 +385,13 @@ static int raw_release(struct socket *sock)
-
- lock_sock(sk);
-
-+ rtnl_lock();
- /* remove current filters & unregister */
- if (ro->bound) {
-- if (ro->ifindex) {
-- struct net_device *dev;
--
-- dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk), ro->ifindex);
-- if (dev) {
-- raw_disable_allfilters(dev_net(dev), dev, sk);
-- dev_put(dev);
-- }
-- } else {
-+ if (ro->dev)
-+ raw_disable_allfilters(dev_net(ro->dev), ro->dev, sk);
-+ else
- raw_disable_allfilters(sock_net(sk), NULL, sk);
-- }
- }
-
- if (ro->count > 1)
-@@ -402,8 +399,10 @@ static int raw_release(struct socket *sock)
-
- ro->ifindex = 0;
- ro->bound = 0;
-+ ro->dev = NULL;
- ro->count = 0;
- free_percpu(ro->uniq);
-+ rtnl_unlock();
-
- sock_orphan(sk);
- sock->sk = NULL;
-@@ -419,6 +418,7 @@ static int raw_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int len)
- struct sockaddr_can *addr = (struct sockaddr_can *)uaddr;
- struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
- struct raw_sock *ro = raw_sk(sk);
-+ struct net_device *dev = NULL;
- int ifindex;
- int err = 0;
- int notify_enetdown = 0;
-@@ -428,14 +428,13 @@ static int raw_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int len)
- if (addr->can_family != AF_CAN)
- return -EINVAL;
-
-+ rtnl_lock();
- lock_sock(sk);
-
- if (ro->bound && addr->can_ifindex == ro->ifindex)
- goto out;
-
- if (addr->can_ifindex) {
-- struct net_device *dev;
--
- dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk), addr->can_ifindex);
- if (!dev) {
- err = -ENODEV;
-@@ -464,26 +463,20 @@ static int raw_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int len)
- if (!err) {
- if (ro->bound) {
- /* unregister old filters */
-- if (ro->ifindex) {
-- struct net_device *dev;
--
-- dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk),
-- ro->ifindex);
-- if (dev) {
-- raw_disable_allfilters(dev_net(dev),
-- dev, sk);
-- dev_put(dev);
-- }
-- } else {
-+ if (ro->dev)
-+ raw_disable_allfilters(dev_net(ro->dev),
-+ ro->dev, sk);
-+ else
- raw_disable_allfilters(sock_net(sk), NULL, sk);
-- }
- }
- ro->ifindex = ifindex;
- ro->bound = 1;
-+ ro->dev = dev;
- }
-
- out:
- release_sock(sk);
-+ rtnl_unlock();
-
- if (notify_enetdown) {
- sk->sk_err = ENETDOWN;
-@@ -549,9 +542,9 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
- rtnl_lock();
- lock_sock(sk);
-
-- if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex) {
-- dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk), ro->ifindex);
-- if (!dev) {
-+ dev = ro->dev;
-+ if (ro->bound && dev) {
-+ if (dev->reg_state != NETREG_REGISTERED) {
- if (count > 1)
- kfree(filter);
- err = -ENODEV;
-@@ -592,7 +585,6 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
- ro->count = count;
-
- out_fil:
-- dev_put(dev);
- release_sock(sk);
- rtnl_unlock();
-
-@@ -610,9 +602,9 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
- rtnl_lock();
- lock_sock(sk);
-
-- if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex) {
-- dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk), ro->ifindex);
-- if (!dev) {
-+ dev = ro->dev;
-+ if (ro->bound && dev) {
-+ if (dev->reg_state != NETREG_REGISTERED) {
- err = -ENODEV;
- goto out_err;
- }
-@@ -636,7 +628,6 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
- ro->err_mask = err_mask;
-
- out_err:
-- dev_put(dev);
- release_sock(sk);
- rtnl_unlock();
-
---
-2.40.1
-
arm-dts-imx6sll-fixup-of-operating-points.patch
arm-dts-nxp-imx6sll-fix-wrong-property-name-in-usbph.patch
btrfs-move-out-now-unused-bg-from-the-reclaim-list.patch
-can-raw-fix-receiver-memory-leak.patch
can-raw-fix-lockdep-issue-in-raw_release.patch
+++ /dev/null
-From efcec66b4f09662bc1994679bcc72c60aafb87c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
-Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 09:17:37 +0800
-Subject: can: raw: fix receiver memory leak
-
-From: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@huawei.com>
-
-[ Upstream commit ee8b94c8510ce64afe0b87ef548d23e00915fb10 ]
-
-Got kmemleak errors with the following ltp can_filter testcase:
-
-for ((i=1; i<=100; i++))
-do
- ./can_filter &
- sleep 0.1
-done
-
-==============================================================
-[<00000000db4a4943>] can_rx_register+0x147/0x360 [can]
-[<00000000a289549d>] raw_setsockopt+0x5ef/0x853 [can_raw]
-[<000000006d3d9ebd>] __sys_setsockopt+0x173/0x2c0
-[<00000000407dbfec>] __x64_sys_setsockopt+0x61/0x70
-[<00000000fd468496>] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
-[<00000000b7e47d51>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xc6
-
-It's a bug in the concurrent scenario of unregister_netdevice_many()
-and raw_release() as following:
-
- cpu0 cpu1
-unregister_netdevice_many(can_dev)
- unlist_netdevice(can_dev) // dev_get_by_index() return NULL after this
- net_set_todo(can_dev)
- raw_release(can_socket)
- dev = dev_get_by_index(, ro->ifindex); // dev == NULL
- if (dev) { // receivers in dev_rcv_lists not free because dev is NULL
- raw_disable_allfilters(, dev, );
- dev_put(dev);
- }
- ...
- ro->bound = 0;
- ...
-
-call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_UNREGISTER, )
- raw_notify(, NETDEV_UNREGISTER, )
- if (ro->bound) // invalid because ro->bound has been set 0
- raw_disable_allfilters(, dev, ); // receivers in dev_rcv_lists will never be freed
-
-Add a net_device pointer member in struct raw_sock to record bound
-can_dev, and use rtnl_lock to serialize raw_socket members between
-raw_bind(), raw_release(), raw_setsockopt() and raw_notify(). Use
-ro->dev to decide whether to free receivers in dev_rcv_lists.
-
-Fixes: 8d0caedb7596 ("can: bcm/raw/isotp: use per module netdevice notifier")
-Reviewed-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
-Acked-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
-Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@huawei.com>
-Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230711011737.1969582-1-william.xuanziyang@huawei.com
-Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
-Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
----
- net/can/raw.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/net/can/raw.c b/net/can/raw.c
-index 4abab2c3011a3..1cd2c8748c26a 100644
---- a/net/can/raw.c
-+++ b/net/can/raw.c
-@@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ struct raw_sock {
- struct sock sk;
- int bound;
- int ifindex;
-+ struct net_device *dev;
- struct list_head notifier;
- int loopback;
- int recv_own_msgs;
-@@ -277,7 +278,7 @@ static void raw_notify(struct raw_sock *ro, unsigned long msg,
- if (!net_eq(dev_net(dev), sock_net(sk)))
- return;
-
-- if (ro->ifindex != dev->ifindex)
-+ if (ro->dev != dev)
- return;
-
- switch (msg) {
-@@ -292,6 +293,7 @@ static void raw_notify(struct raw_sock *ro, unsigned long msg,
-
- ro->ifindex = 0;
- ro->bound = 0;
-+ ro->dev = NULL;
- ro->count = 0;
- release_sock(sk);
-
-@@ -337,6 +339,7 @@ static int raw_init(struct sock *sk)
-
- ro->bound = 0;
- ro->ifindex = 0;
-+ ro->dev = NULL;
-
- /* set default filter to single entry dfilter */
- ro->dfilter.can_id = 0;
-@@ -385,19 +388,13 @@ static int raw_release(struct socket *sock)
-
- lock_sock(sk);
-
-+ rtnl_lock();
- /* remove current filters & unregister */
- if (ro->bound) {
-- if (ro->ifindex) {
-- struct net_device *dev;
--
-- dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk), ro->ifindex);
-- if (dev) {
-- raw_disable_allfilters(dev_net(dev), dev, sk);
-- dev_put(dev);
-- }
-- } else {
-+ if (ro->dev)
-+ raw_disable_allfilters(dev_net(ro->dev), ro->dev, sk);
-+ else
- raw_disable_allfilters(sock_net(sk), NULL, sk);
-- }
- }
-
- if (ro->count > 1)
-@@ -405,8 +402,10 @@ static int raw_release(struct socket *sock)
-
- ro->ifindex = 0;
- ro->bound = 0;
-+ ro->dev = NULL;
- ro->count = 0;
- free_percpu(ro->uniq);
-+ rtnl_unlock();
-
- sock_orphan(sk);
- sock->sk = NULL;
-@@ -422,6 +421,7 @@ static int raw_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int len)
- struct sockaddr_can *addr = (struct sockaddr_can *)uaddr;
- struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
- struct raw_sock *ro = raw_sk(sk);
-+ struct net_device *dev = NULL;
- int ifindex;
- int err = 0;
- int notify_enetdown = 0;
-@@ -431,14 +431,13 @@ static int raw_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int len)
- if (addr->can_family != AF_CAN)
- return -EINVAL;
-
-+ rtnl_lock();
- lock_sock(sk);
-
- if (ro->bound && addr->can_ifindex == ro->ifindex)
- goto out;
-
- if (addr->can_ifindex) {
-- struct net_device *dev;
--
- dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk), addr->can_ifindex);
- if (!dev) {
- err = -ENODEV;
-@@ -467,26 +466,20 @@ static int raw_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int len)
- if (!err) {
- if (ro->bound) {
- /* unregister old filters */
-- if (ro->ifindex) {
-- struct net_device *dev;
--
-- dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk),
-- ro->ifindex);
-- if (dev) {
-- raw_disable_allfilters(dev_net(dev),
-- dev, sk);
-- dev_put(dev);
-- }
-- } else {
-+ if (ro->dev)
-+ raw_disable_allfilters(dev_net(ro->dev),
-+ ro->dev, sk);
-+ else
- raw_disable_allfilters(sock_net(sk), NULL, sk);
-- }
- }
- ro->ifindex = ifindex;
- ro->bound = 1;
-+ ro->dev = dev;
- }
-
- out:
- release_sock(sk);
-+ rtnl_unlock();
-
- if (notify_enetdown) {
- sk->sk_err = ENETDOWN;
-@@ -552,9 +545,9 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
- rtnl_lock();
- lock_sock(sk);
-
-- if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex) {
-- dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk), ro->ifindex);
-- if (!dev) {
-+ dev = ro->dev;
-+ if (ro->bound && dev) {
-+ if (dev->reg_state != NETREG_REGISTERED) {
- if (count > 1)
- kfree(filter);
- err = -ENODEV;
-@@ -595,7 +588,6 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
- ro->count = count;
-
- out_fil:
-- dev_put(dev);
- release_sock(sk);
- rtnl_unlock();
-
-@@ -613,9 +605,9 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
- rtnl_lock();
- lock_sock(sk);
-
-- if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex) {
-- dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk), ro->ifindex);
-- if (!dev) {
-+ dev = ro->dev;
-+ if (ro->bound && dev) {
-+ if (dev->reg_state != NETREG_REGISTERED) {
- err = -ENODEV;
- goto out_err;
- }
-@@ -639,7 +631,6 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
- ro->err_mask = err_mask;
-
- out_err:
-- dev_put(dev);
- release_sock(sk);
- rtnl_unlock();
-
---
-2.40.1
-
btrfs-convert-btrfs_block_group-needs_free_space-to-.patch
btrfs-convert-btrfs_block_group-seq_zone-to-runtime-.patch
btrfs-fix-use-after-free-of-new-block-group-that-bec.patch
-can-raw-fix-receiver-memory-leak.patch
can-raw-fix-lockdep-issue-in-raw_release.patch
+++ /dev/null
-From c2456f5b8df8441191e1c596d4933b71425b6ac4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
-Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 09:17:37 +0800
-Subject: can: raw: fix receiver memory leak
-
-From: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@huawei.com>
-
-[ Upstream commit ee8b94c8510ce64afe0b87ef548d23e00915fb10 ]
-
-Got kmemleak errors with the following ltp can_filter testcase:
-
-for ((i=1; i<=100; i++))
-do
- ./can_filter &
- sleep 0.1
-done
-
-==============================================================
-[<00000000db4a4943>] can_rx_register+0x147/0x360 [can]
-[<00000000a289549d>] raw_setsockopt+0x5ef/0x853 [can_raw]
-[<000000006d3d9ebd>] __sys_setsockopt+0x173/0x2c0
-[<00000000407dbfec>] __x64_sys_setsockopt+0x61/0x70
-[<00000000fd468496>] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
-[<00000000b7e47d51>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xc6
-
-It's a bug in the concurrent scenario of unregister_netdevice_many()
-and raw_release() as following:
-
- cpu0 cpu1
-unregister_netdevice_many(can_dev)
- unlist_netdevice(can_dev) // dev_get_by_index() return NULL after this
- net_set_todo(can_dev)
- raw_release(can_socket)
- dev = dev_get_by_index(, ro->ifindex); // dev == NULL
- if (dev) { // receivers in dev_rcv_lists not free because dev is NULL
- raw_disable_allfilters(, dev, );
- dev_put(dev);
- }
- ...
- ro->bound = 0;
- ...
-
-call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_UNREGISTER, )
- raw_notify(, NETDEV_UNREGISTER, )
- if (ro->bound) // invalid because ro->bound has been set 0
- raw_disable_allfilters(, dev, ); // receivers in dev_rcv_lists will never be freed
-
-Add a net_device pointer member in struct raw_sock to record bound
-can_dev, and use rtnl_lock to serialize raw_socket members between
-raw_bind(), raw_release(), raw_setsockopt() and raw_notify(). Use
-ro->dev to decide whether to free receivers in dev_rcv_lists.
-
-Fixes: 8d0caedb7596 ("can: bcm/raw/isotp: use per module netdevice notifier")
-Reviewed-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
-Acked-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
-Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@huawei.com>
-Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230711011737.1969582-1-william.xuanziyang@huawei.com
-Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
-Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
----
- net/can/raw.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/net/can/raw.c b/net/can/raw.c
-index f8e3866157a33..9fdad12d16325 100644
---- a/net/can/raw.c
-+++ b/net/can/raw.c
-@@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ struct raw_sock {
- struct sock sk;
- int bound;
- int ifindex;
-+ struct net_device *dev;
- struct list_head notifier;
- int loopback;
- int recv_own_msgs;
-@@ -277,7 +278,7 @@ static void raw_notify(struct raw_sock *ro, unsigned long msg,
- if (!net_eq(dev_net(dev), sock_net(sk)))
- return;
-
-- if (ro->ifindex != dev->ifindex)
-+ if (ro->dev != dev)
- return;
-
- switch (msg) {
-@@ -292,6 +293,7 @@ static void raw_notify(struct raw_sock *ro, unsigned long msg,
-
- ro->ifindex = 0;
- ro->bound = 0;
-+ ro->dev = NULL;
- ro->count = 0;
- release_sock(sk);
-
-@@ -337,6 +339,7 @@ static int raw_init(struct sock *sk)
-
- ro->bound = 0;
- ro->ifindex = 0;
-+ ro->dev = NULL;
-
- /* set default filter to single entry dfilter */
- ro->dfilter.can_id = 0;
-@@ -385,19 +388,13 @@ static int raw_release(struct socket *sock)
-
- lock_sock(sk);
-
-+ rtnl_lock();
- /* remove current filters & unregister */
- if (ro->bound) {
-- if (ro->ifindex) {
-- struct net_device *dev;
--
-- dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk), ro->ifindex);
-- if (dev) {
-- raw_disable_allfilters(dev_net(dev), dev, sk);
-- dev_put(dev);
-- }
-- } else {
-+ if (ro->dev)
-+ raw_disable_allfilters(dev_net(ro->dev), ro->dev, sk);
-+ else
- raw_disable_allfilters(sock_net(sk), NULL, sk);
-- }
- }
-
- if (ro->count > 1)
-@@ -405,8 +402,10 @@ static int raw_release(struct socket *sock)
-
- ro->ifindex = 0;
- ro->bound = 0;
-+ ro->dev = NULL;
- ro->count = 0;
- free_percpu(ro->uniq);
-+ rtnl_unlock();
-
- sock_orphan(sk);
- sock->sk = NULL;
-@@ -422,6 +421,7 @@ static int raw_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int len)
- struct sockaddr_can *addr = (struct sockaddr_can *)uaddr;
- struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
- struct raw_sock *ro = raw_sk(sk);
-+ struct net_device *dev = NULL;
- int ifindex;
- int err = 0;
- int notify_enetdown = 0;
-@@ -431,14 +431,13 @@ static int raw_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int len)
- if (addr->can_family != AF_CAN)
- return -EINVAL;
-
-+ rtnl_lock();
- lock_sock(sk);
-
- if (ro->bound && addr->can_ifindex == ro->ifindex)
- goto out;
-
- if (addr->can_ifindex) {
-- struct net_device *dev;
--
- dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk), addr->can_ifindex);
- if (!dev) {
- err = -ENODEV;
-@@ -467,26 +466,20 @@ static int raw_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int len)
- if (!err) {
- if (ro->bound) {
- /* unregister old filters */
-- if (ro->ifindex) {
-- struct net_device *dev;
--
-- dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk),
-- ro->ifindex);
-- if (dev) {
-- raw_disable_allfilters(dev_net(dev),
-- dev, sk);
-- dev_put(dev);
-- }
-- } else {
-+ if (ro->dev)
-+ raw_disable_allfilters(dev_net(ro->dev),
-+ ro->dev, sk);
-+ else
- raw_disable_allfilters(sock_net(sk), NULL, sk);
-- }
- }
- ro->ifindex = ifindex;
- ro->bound = 1;
-+ ro->dev = dev;
- }
-
- out:
- release_sock(sk);
-+ rtnl_unlock();
-
- if (notify_enetdown) {
- sk->sk_err = ENETDOWN;
-@@ -553,9 +546,9 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
- rtnl_lock();
- lock_sock(sk);
-
-- if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex) {
-- dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk), ro->ifindex);
-- if (!dev) {
-+ dev = ro->dev;
-+ if (ro->bound && dev) {
-+ if (dev->reg_state != NETREG_REGISTERED) {
- if (count > 1)
- kfree(filter);
- err = -ENODEV;
-@@ -596,7 +589,6 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
- ro->count = count;
-
- out_fil:
-- dev_put(dev);
- release_sock(sk);
- rtnl_unlock();
-
-@@ -614,9 +606,9 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
- rtnl_lock();
- lock_sock(sk);
-
-- if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex) {
-- dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk), ro->ifindex);
-- if (!dev) {
-+ dev = ro->dev;
-+ if (ro->bound && dev) {
-+ if (dev->reg_state != NETREG_REGISTERED) {
- err = -ENODEV;
- goto out_err;
- }
-@@ -640,7 +632,6 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
- ro->err_mask = err_mask;
-
- out_err:
-- dev_put(dev);
- release_sock(sk);
- rtnl_unlock();
-
---
-2.40.1
-
ring-buffer-do-not-swap-cpu_buffer-during-resize-pro.patch
btrfs-move-out-now-unused-bg-from-the-reclaim-list.patch
btrfs-fix-use-after-free-of-new-block-group-that-bec.patch
-can-raw-fix-receiver-memory-leak.patch
can-raw-fix-lockdep-issue-in-raw_release.patch