docs: networking: timestamping: improve stacked PHC sentence

The first paragraph makes no grammatical sense. I suppose a portion of
the intended sentece is missing: "[The challenge with ] stacked PHCs
(...) is that they uncover bugs".

Rephrase, and at the same time simplify the structure of the sentence a
little bit, it is not easy to follow.

Fixes: 94d9f78f4d64 ("docs: networking: timestamping: add section for stacked PHC devices")
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Acked-by: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250512131751.320283-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

diff --git a/Documentation/networking/timestamping.rst b/Documentation/networking/timestamping.rst
index b8fef8101176dcf3e85e58d19234049380a00baa..7aabead906487ef460868ad6ac7a95a1e50fa546 100644 (file)
--- a/Documentation/networking/timestamping.rst
+++ b/Documentation/networking/timestamping.rst
@@ -811,11 +811,9 @@ Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ptp/timestamper.txt for more details.
 3.2.4 Other caveats for MAC drivers
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 
-Stacked PHCs, especially DSA (but not only) - since that doesn't require any
-modification to MAC drivers, so it is more difficult to ensure correctness of
-all possible code paths - is that they uncover bugs which were impossible to
-trigger before the existence of stacked PTP clocks.  One example has to do with
-this line of code, already presented earlier::
+The use of stacked PHCs may uncover MAC driver bugs which were impossible to
+trigger without them. One example has to do with this line of code, already
+presented earlier::
 
       skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags |= SKBTX_IN_PROGRESS;