--- /dev/null
+From c5c7b8ddfbf8cb3b2291e515a34ab1b8982f5a2d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
+Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 23:46:28 -0400
+Subject: ext4: Fix buffer double free in ext4_alloc_branch()
+
+From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
+
+commit c5c7b8ddfbf8cb3b2291e515a34ab1b8982f5a2d upstream.
+
+Error recovery in ext4_alloc_branch() calls ext4_forget() even for
+buffer corresponding to indirect block it did not allocate. This leads
+to brelse() being called twice for that buffer (once from ext4_forget()
+and once from cleanup in ext4_ind_map_blocks()) leading to buffer use
+count misaccounting. Eventually (but often much later because there
+are other users of the buffer) we will see messages like:
+VFS: brelse: Trying to free free buffer
+
+Another manifestation of this problem is an error:
+JBD2 unexpected failure: jbd2_journal_revoke: !buffer_revoked(bh);
+inconsistent data on disk
+
+The fix is easy - don't forget buffer we did not allocate. Also add an
+explanatory comment because the indexing at ext4_alloc_branch() is
+somewhat subtle.
+
+Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
+Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ fs/ext4/indirect.c | 8 +++++++-
+ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- a/fs/ext4/indirect.c
++++ b/fs/ext4/indirect.c
+@@ -390,7 +390,13 @@ static int ext4_alloc_branch(handle_t *h
+ return 0;
+ failed:
+ for (; i >= 0; i--) {
+- if (i != indirect_blks && branch[i].bh)
++ /*
++ * We want to ext4_forget() only freshly allocated indirect
++ * blocks. Buffer for new_blocks[i-1] is at branch[i].bh and
++ * buffer at branch[0].bh is indirect block / inode already
++ * existing before ext4_alloc_branch() was called.
++ */
++ if (i > 0 && i != indirect_blks && branch[i].bh)
+ ext4_forget(handle, 1, inode, branch[i].bh,
+ branch[i].bh->b_blocknr);
+ ext4_free_blocks(handle, inode, NULL, new_blocks[i],
--- /dev/null
+From a93cd4cf86466caa49cfe64607bea7f0bde3f916 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
+Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:30:54 -0400
+Subject: ext4: Fix hole punching for files with indirect blocks
+
+From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
+
+commit a93cd4cf86466caa49cfe64607bea7f0bde3f916 upstream.
+
+Hole punching code for files with indirect blocks wrongly computed
+number of blocks which need to be cleared when traversing the indirect
+block tree. That could result in punching more blocks than actually
+requested and thus effectively cause a data loss. For example:
+
+fallocate -n -p 10240000 4096
+
+will punch the range 10240000 - 12632064 instead of the range 1024000 -
+10244096. Fix the calculation.
+
+Fixes: 8bad6fc813a3a5300f51369c39d315679fd88c72
+Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
+Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ fs/ext4/indirect.c | 12 ++++++++++--
+ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/fs/ext4/indirect.c
++++ b/fs/ext4/indirect.c
+@@ -1331,16 +1331,24 @@ static int free_hole_blocks(handle_t *ha
+ blk = *i_data;
+ if (level > 0) {
+ ext4_lblk_t first2;
++ ext4_lblk_t count2;
++
+ bh = sb_bread(inode->i_sb, le32_to_cpu(blk));
+ if (!bh) {
+ EXT4_ERROR_INODE_BLOCK(inode, le32_to_cpu(blk),
+ "Read failure");
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+- first2 = (first > offset) ? first - offset : 0;
++ if (first > offset) {
++ first2 = first - offset;
++ count2 = count;
++ } else {
++ first2 = 0;
++ count2 = count - (offset - first);
++ }
+ ret = free_hole_blocks(handle, inode, bh,
+ (__le32 *)bh->b_data, level - 1,
+- first2, count - offset,
++ first2, count2,
+ inode->i_sb->s_blocksize >> 2);
+ if (ret) {
+ brelse(bh);
arm64-bug-fix-in-stack-alignment-exception.patch
b43-fix-frequency-reported-on-g-phy-with-new-firmware.patch
cifs-fix-mount-failure-with-broken-pathnames-when-smb3-mount-with-mapchars-option.patch
+ext4-fix-buffer-double-free-in-ext4_alloc_branch.patch
+ext4-fix-hole-punching-for-files-with-indirect-blocks.patch