]> git.ipfire.org Git - thirdparty/gcc.git/commitdiff
testsuite: Add test for already-fixed issue with _Pragma expansion [PR90400]
authorLewis Hyatt <lhyatt@gmail.com>
Fri, 25 Aug 2023 19:57:19 +0000 (15:57 -0400)
committerLewis Hyatt <lhyatt@gmail.com>
Wed, 20 Sep 2023 20:44:25 +0000 (16:44 -0400)
The PR was fixed by r12-5454. Since the fix was somewhat incidental,
although related, add a testcase from PR90400 too before closing it out.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

PR preprocessor/90400
* c-c++-common/cpp/pr90400.c: New test.

gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cpp/pr90400.c [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cpp/pr90400.c b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cpp/pr90400.c
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..4f2cab8
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-save-temps" } */
+/* PR preprocessor/90400 */
+
+#define OUTER(x) x
+#define FOR(x) _Pragma ("GCC unroll 0") for (x)
+void f ()
+{
+    /* If the pragma were to be seen prior to the expansion of FOR, as was
+       the case before r12-5454, then the unroll pragma would complain
+       because the immediately following statement would be ";" rather than
+       a loop.  */
+    OUTER (; FOR (int i = 0; i != 1; ++i);) /* { dg-bogus {statement expected before ';' token} } */
+}