]> git.ipfire.org Git - thirdparty/kernel/stable-queue.git/commitdiff
drop exfat patch from all trees
authorGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Sat, 4 Jun 2022 10:02:53 +0000 (12:02 +0200)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Sat, 4 Jun 2022 10:02:53 +0000 (12:02 +0200)
queue-5.10/exfat-fix-referencing-wrong-parent-directory-information-after-renaming.patch [deleted file]
queue-5.10/series
queue-5.15/exfat-fix-referencing-wrong-parent-directory-information-after-renaming.patch [deleted file]
queue-5.15/series
queue-5.17/exfat-fix-referencing-wrong-parent-directory-information-after-renaming.patch [deleted file]
queue-5.17/series
queue-5.18/exfat-fix-referencing-wrong-parent-directory-information-after-renaming.patch [deleted file]
queue-5.18/series

diff --git a/queue-5.10/exfat-fix-referencing-wrong-parent-directory-information-after-renaming.patch b/queue-5.10/exfat-fix-referencing-wrong-parent-directory-information-after-renaming.patch
deleted file mode 100644 (file)
index 1723479..0000000
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,98 +0,0 @@
-From d8dad2588addd1d861ce19e7df3b702330f0c7e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>
-Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 11:58:06 +0900
-Subject: exfat: fix referencing wrong parent directory information after renaming
-
-From: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>
-
-commit d8dad2588addd1d861ce19e7df3b702330f0c7e3 upstream.
-
-During renaming, the parent directory information maybe
-updated. But the file/directory still references to the
-old parent directory information.
-
-This bug will cause 2 problems.
-
-(1) The renamed file can not be written.
-
-    [10768.175172] exFAT-fs (sda1): error, failed to bmap (inode : 7afd50e4 iblock : 0, err : -5)
-    [10768.184285] exFAT-fs (sda1): Filesystem has been set read-only
-    ash: write error: Input/output error
-
-(2) Some dentries of the renamed file/directory are not set
-    to deleted after removing the file/directory.
-
-exfat_update_parent_info() is a workaround for the wrong parent
-directory information being used after renaming. Now that bug is
-fixed, this is no longer needed, so remove it.
-
-Fixes: 5f2aa075070c ("exfat: add inode operations")
-Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7+
-Signed-off-by: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>
-Reviewed-by: Andy Wu <Andy.Wu@sony.com>
-Reviewed-by: Aoyama Wataru <wataru.aoyama@sony.com>
-Reviewed-by: Daniel Palmer <daniel.palmer@sony.com>
-Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
-Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
-Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
----
- fs/exfat/namei.c |   27 +--------------------------
- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 26 deletions(-)
-
---- a/fs/exfat/namei.c
-+++ b/fs/exfat/namei.c
-@@ -1061,6 +1061,7 @@ static int exfat_rename_file(struct inod
-               exfat_remove_entries(inode, p_dir, oldentry, 0,
-                       num_old_entries);
-+              ei->dir = *p_dir;
-               ei->entry = newentry;
-       } else {
-               if (exfat_get_entry_type(epold) == TYPE_FILE) {
-@@ -1151,28 +1152,6 @@ static int exfat_move_file(struct inode
-       return 0;
- }
--static void exfat_update_parent_info(struct exfat_inode_info *ei,
--              struct inode *parent_inode)
--{
--      struct exfat_sb_info *sbi = EXFAT_SB(parent_inode->i_sb);
--      struct exfat_inode_info *parent_ei = EXFAT_I(parent_inode);
--      loff_t parent_isize = i_size_read(parent_inode);
--
--      /*
--       * the problem that struct exfat_inode_info caches wrong parent info.
--       *
--       * because of flag-mismatch of ei->dir,
--       * there is abnormal traversing cluster chain.
--       */
--      if (unlikely(parent_ei->flags != ei->dir.flags ||
--                   parent_isize != EXFAT_CLU_TO_B(ei->dir.size, sbi) ||
--                   parent_ei->start_clu != ei->dir.dir)) {
--              exfat_chain_set(&ei->dir, parent_ei->start_clu,
--                      EXFAT_B_TO_CLU_ROUND_UP(parent_isize, sbi),
--                      parent_ei->flags);
--      }
--}
--
- /* rename or move a old file into a new file */
- static int __exfat_rename(struct inode *old_parent_inode,
-               struct exfat_inode_info *ei, struct inode *new_parent_inode,
-@@ -1203,8 +1182,6 @@ static int __exfat_rename(struct inode *
-               return -ENOENT;
-       }
--      exfat_update_parent_info(ei, old_parent_inode);
--
-       exfat_chain_dup(&olddir, &ei->dir);
-       dentry = ei->entry;
-@@ -1225,8 +1202,6 @@ static int __exfat_rename(struct inode *
-                       goto out;
-               }
--              exfat_update_parent_info(new_ei, new_parent_inode);
--
-               p_dir = &(new_ei->dir);
-               new_entry = new_ei->entry;
-               ep = exfat_get_dentry(sb, p_dir, new_entry, &new_bh, NULL);
index edf5de9017926e4f2efe9c5f1cb97405369b0987..81555d29fc2d8481dfc3778e0df6badba1df86de 100644 (file)
@@ -20,7 +20,6 @@ xfs-fix-an-abba-deadlock-in-xfs_rename.patch
 xfs-fix-cil-throttle-hang-when-cil-space-used-going-backwards.patch
 drm-i915-fix-wstringop-overflow-warning-in-call-to-intel_read_wm_latency.patch
 exfat-check-if-cluster-num-is-valid.patch
-exfat-fix-referencing-wrong-parent-directory-information-after-renaming.patch
 lib-crypto-add-prompts-back-to-crypto-libraries.patch
 crypto-drbg-prepare-for-more-fine-grained-tracking-of-seeding-state.patch
 crypto-drbg-track-whether-drbg-was-seeded-with-rng_is_initialized.patch
diff --git a/queue-5.15/exfat-fix-referencing-wrong-parent-directory-information-after-renaming.patch b/queue-5.15/exfat-fix-referencing-wrong-parent-directory-information-after-renaming.patch
deleted file mode 100644 (file)
index 1e3d6f8..0000000
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,98 +0,0 @@
-From d8dad2588addd1d861ce19e7df3b702330f0c7e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>
-Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 11:58:06 +0900
-Subject: exfat: fix referencing wrong parent directory information after renaming
-
-From: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>
-
-commit d8dad2588addd1d861ce19e7df3b702330f0c7e3 upstream.
-
-During renaming, the parent directory information maybe
-updated. But the file/directory still references to the
-old parent directory information.
-
-This bug will cause 2 problems.
-
-(1) The renamed file can not be written.
-
-    [10768.175172] exFAT-fs (sda1): error, failed to bmap (inode : 7afd50e4 iblock : 0, err : -5)
-    [10768.184285] exFAT-fs (sda1): Filesystem has been set read-only
-    ash: write error: Input/output error
-
-(2) Some dentries of the renamed file/directory are not set
-    to deleted after removing the file/directory.
-
-exfat_update_parent_info() is a workaround for the wrong parent
-directory information being used after renaming. Now that bug is
-fixed, this is no longer needed, so remove it.
-
-Fixes: 5f2aa075070c ("exfat: add inode operations")
-Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7+
-Signed-off-by: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>
-Reviewed-by: Andy Wu <Andy.Wu@sony.com>
-Reviewed-by: Aoyama Wataru <wataru.aoyama@sony.com>
-Reviewed-by: Daniel Palmer <daniel.palmer@sony.com>
-Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
-Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
-Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
----
- fs/exfat/namei.c |   27 +--------------------------
- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 26 deletions(-)
-
---- a/fs/exfat/namei.c
-+++ b/fs/exfat/namei.c
-@@ -1069,6 +1069,7 @@ static int exfat_rename_file(struct inod
-               exfat_remove_entries(inode, p_dir, oldentry, 0,
-                       num_old_entries);
-+              ei->dir = *p_dir;
-               ei->entry = newentry;
-       } else {
-               if (exfat_get_entry_type(epold) == TYPE_FILE) {
-@@ -1159,28 +1160,6 @@ static int exfat_move_file(struct inode
-       return 0;
- }
--static void exfat_update_parent_info(struct exfat_inode_info *ei,
--              struct inode *parent_inode)
--{
--      struct exfat_sb_info *sbi = EXFAT_SB(parent_inode->i_sb);
--      struct exfat_inode_info *parent_ei = EXFAT_I(parent_inode);
--      loff_t parent_isize = i_size_read(parent_inode);
--
--      /*
--       * the problem that struct exfat_inode_info caches wrong parent info.
--       *
--       * because of flag-mismatch of ei->dir,
--       * there is abnormal traversing cluster chain.
--       */
--      if (unlikely(parent_ei->flags != ei->dir.flags ||
--                   parent_isize != EXFAT_CLU_TO_B(ei->dir.size, sbi) ||
--                   parent_ei->start_clu != ei->dir.dir)) {
--              exfat_chain_set(&ei->dir, parent_ei->start_clu,
--                      EXFAT_B_TO_CLU_ROUND_UP(parent_isize, sbi),
--                      parent_ei->flags);
--      }
--}
--
- /* rename or move a old file into a new file */
- static int __exfat_rename(struct inode *old_parent_inode,
-               struct exfat_inode_info *ei, struct inode *new_parent_inode,
-@@ -1211,8 +1190,6 @@ static int __exfat_rename(struct inode *
-               return -ENOENT;
-       }
--      exfat_update_parent_info(ei, old_parent_inode);
--
-       exfat_chain_dup(&olddir, &ei->dir);
-       dentry = ei->entry;
-@@ -1233,8 +1210,6 @@ static int __exfat_rename(struct inode *
-                       goto out;
-               }
--              exfat_update_parent_info(new_ei, new_parent_inode);
--
-               p_dir = &(new_ei->dir);
-               new_entry = new_ei->entry;
-               ep = exfat_get_dentry(sb, p_dir, new_entry, &new_bh, NULL);
index 20fe10b25fe4812ddca85a2e9a65d1a030b7615d..c4216f21591c612408b47a50008b17a90f75b42a 100644 (file)
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ pipe-fix-missing-lock-in-pipe_resize_ring.patch
 net-ipa-compute-proper-aggregation-limit.patch
 drm-i915-fix-wstringop-overflow-warning-in-call-to-intel_read_wm_latency.patch
 exfat-check-if-cluster-num-is-valid.patch
-exfat-fix-referencing-wrong-parent-directory-information-after-renaming.patch
 lib-crypto-add-prompts-back-to-crypto-libraries.patch
 crypto-drbg-prepare-for-more-fine-grained-tracking-of-seeding-state.patch
 crypto-drbg-track-whether-drbg-was-seeded-with-rng_is_initialized.patch
diff --git a/queue-5.17/exfat-fix-referencing-wrong-parent-directory-information-after-renaming.patch b/queue-5.17/exfat-fix-referencing-wrong-parent-directory-information-after-renaming.patch
deleted file mode 100644 (file)
index a827559..0000000
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,98 +0,0 @@
-From d8dad2588addd1d861ce19e7df3b702330f0c7e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>
-Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 11:58:06 +0900
-Subject: exfat: fix referencing wrong parent directory information after renaming
-
-From: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>
-
-commit d8dad2588addd1d861ce19e7df3b702330f0c7e3 upstream.
-
-During renaming, the parent directory information maybe
-updated. But the file/directory still references to the
-old parent directory information.
-
-This bug will cause 2 problems.
-
-(1) The renamed file can not be written.
-
-    [10768.175172] exFAT-fs (sda1): error, failed to bmap (inode : 7afd50e4 iblock : 0, err : -5)
-    [10768.184285] exFAT-fs (sda1): Filesystem has been set read-only
-    ash: write error: Input/output error
-
-(2) Some dentries of the renamed file/directory are not set
-    to deleted after removing the file/directory.
-
-exfat_update_parent_info() is a workaround for the wrong parent
-directory information being used after renaming. Now that bug is
-fixed, this is no longer needed, so remove it.
-
-Fixes: 5f2aa075070c ("exfat: add inode operations")
-Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7+
-Signed-off-by: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>
-Reviewed-by: Andy Wu <Andy.Wu@sony.com>
-Reviewed-by: Aoyama Wataru <wataru.aoyama@sony.com>
-Reviewed-by: Daniel Palmer <daniel.palmer@sony.com>
-Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
-Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
-Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
----
- fs/exfat/namei.c |   27 +--------------------------
- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 26 deletions(-)
-
---- a/fs/exfat/namei.c
-+++ b/fs/exfat/namei.c
-@@ -1062,6 +1062,7 @@ static int exfat_rename_file(struct inod
-               exfat_remove_entries(inode, p_dir, oldentry, 0,
-                       num_old_entries);
-+              ei->dir = *p_dir;
-               ei->entry = newentry;
-       } else {
-               if (exfat_get_entry_type(epold) == TYPE_FILE) {
-@@ -1149,28 +1150,6 @@ static int exfat_move_file(struct inode
-       return 0;
- }
--static void exfat_update_parent_info(struct exfat_inode_info *ei,
--              struct inode *parent_inode)
--{
--      struct exfat_sb_info *sbi = EXFAT_SB(parent_inode->i_sb);
--      struct exfat_inode_info *parent_ei = EXFAT_I(parent_inode);
--      loff_t parent_isize = i_size_read(parent_inode);
--
--      /*
--       * the problem that struct exfat_inode_info caches wrong parent info.
--       *
--       * because of flag-mismatch of ei->dir,
--       * there is abnormal traversing cluster chain.
--       */
--      if (unlikely(parent_ei->flags != ei->dir.flags ||
--                   parent_isize != EXFAT_CLU_TO_B(ei->dir.size, sbi) ||
--                   parent_ei->start_clu != ei->dir.dir)) {
--              exfat_chain_set(&ei->dir, parent_ei->start_clu,
--                      EXFAT_B_TO_CLU_ROUND_UP(parent_isize, sbi),
--                      parent_ei->flags);
--      }
--}
--
- /* rename or move a old file into a new file */
- static int __exfat_rename(struct inode *old_parent_inode,
-               struct exfat_inode_info *ei, struct inode *new_parent_inode,
-@@ -1201,8 +1180,6 @@ static int __exfat_rename(struct inode *
-               return -ENOENT;
-       }
--      exfat_update_parent_info(ei, old_parent_inode);
--
-       exfat_chain_dup(&olddir, &ei->dir);
-       dentry = ei->entry;
-@@ -1223,8 +1200,6 @@ static int __exfat_rename(struct inode *
-                       goto out;
-               }
--              exfat_update_parent_info(new_ei, new_parent_inode);
--
-               p_dir = &(new_ei->dir);
-               new_entry = new_ei->entry;
-               ep = exfat_get_dentry(sb, p_dir, new_entry, &new_bh);
index 6bd295d9f7bb67d7aad22be8815373dd7a0e65cc..83d204c1ef7f26350ac5d66e56469b600804058f 100644 (file)
@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ pipe-fix-missing-lock-in-pipe_resize_ring.patch
 net-ipa-compute-proper-aggregation-limit.patch
 drm-i915-fix-wstringop-overflow-warning-in-call-to-intel_read_wm_latency.patch
 exfat-check-if-cluster-num-is-valid.patch
-exfat-fix-referencing-wrong-parent-directory-information-after-renaming.patch
 netfilter-nft_limit-clone-packet-limits-cost-value.patch
 netfilter-nf_tables-sanitize-nft_set_desc_concat_parse.patch
 netfilter-nf_tables-hold-mutex-on-netns-pre_exit-path.patch
diff --git a/queue-5.18/exfat-fix-referencing-wrong-parent-directory-information-after-renaming.patch b/queue-5.18/exfat-fix-referencing-wrong-parent-directory-information-after-renaming.patch
deleted file mode 100644 (file)
index 58cf7d8..0000000
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,98 +0,0 @@
-From d8dad2588addd1d861ce19e7df3b702330f0c7e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>
-Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 11:58:06 +0900
-Subject: exfat: fix referencing wrong parent directory information after renaming
-
-From: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>
-
-commit d8dad2588addd1d861ce19e7df3b702330f0c7e3 upstream.
-
-During renaming, the parent directory information maybe
-updated. But the file/directory still references to the
-old parent directory information.
-
-This bug will cause 2 problems.
-
-(1) The renamed file can not be written.
-
-    [10768.175172] exFAT-fs (sda1): error, failed to bmap (inode : 7afd50e4 iblock : 0, err : -5)
-    [10768.184285] exFAT-fs (sda1): Filesystem has been set read-only
-    ash: write error: Input/output error
-
-(2) Some dentries of the renamed file/directory are not set
-    to deleted after removing the file/directory.
-
-exfat_update_parent_info() is a workaround for the wrong parent
-directory information being used after renaming. Now that bug is
-fixed, this is no longer needed, so remove it.
-
-Fixes: 5f2aa075070c ("exfat: add inode operations")
-Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7+
-Signed-off-by: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>
-Reviewed-by: Andy Wu <Andy.Wu@sony.com>
-Reviewed-by: Aoyama Wataru <wataru.aoyama@sony.com>
-Reviewed-by: Daniel Palmer <daniel.palmer@sony.com>
-Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
-Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
-Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
----
- fs/exfat/namei.c |   27 +--------------------------
- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 26 deletions(-)
-
---- a/fs/exfat/namei.c
-+++ b/fs/exfat/namei.c
-@@ -1080,6 +1080,7 @@ static int exfat_rename_file(struct inod
-               exfat_remove_entries(inode, p_dir, oldentry, 0,
-                       num_old_entries);
-+              ei->dir = *p_dir;
-               ei->entry = newentry;
-       } else {
-               if (exfat_get_entry_type(epold) == TYPE_FILE) {
-@@ -1167,28 +1168,6 @@ static int exfat_move_file(struct inode
-       return 0;
- }
--static void exfat_update_parent_info(struct exfat_inode_info *ei,
--              struct inode *parent_inode)
--{
--      struct exfat_sb_info *sbi = EXFAT_SB(parent_inode->i_sb);
--      struct exfat_inode_info *parent_ei = EXFAT_I(parent_inode);
--      loff_t parent_isize = i_size_read(parent_inode);
--
--      /*
--       * the problem that struct exfat_inode_info caches wrong parent info.
--       *
--       * because of flag-mismatch of ei->dir,
--       * there is abnormal traversing cluster chain.
--       */
--      if (unlikely(parent_ei->flags != ei->dir.flags ||
--                   parent_isize != EXFAT_CLU_TO_B(ei->dir.size, sbi) ||
--                   parent_ei->start_clu != ei->dir.dir)) {
--              exfat_chain_set(&ei->dir, parent_ei->start_clu,
--                      EXFAT_B_TO_CLU_ROUND_UP(parent_isize, sbi),
--                      parent_ei->flags);
--      }
--}
--
- /* rename or move a old file into a new file */
- static int __exfat_rename(struct inode *old_parent_inode,
-               struct exfat_inode_info *ei, struct inode *new_parent_inode,
-@@ -1219,8 +1198,6 @@ static int __exfat_rename(struct inode *
-               return -ENOENT;
-       }
--      exfat_update_parent_info(ei, old_parent_inode);
--
-       exfat_chain_dup(&olddir, &ei->dir);
-       dentry = ei->entry;
-@@ -1241,8 +1218,6 @@ static int __exfat_rename(struct inode *
-                       goto out;
-               }
--              exfat_update_parent_info(new_ei, new_parent_inode);
--
-               p_dir = &(new_ei->dir);
-               new_entry = new_ei->entry;
-               ep = exfat_get_dentry(sb, p_dir, new_entry, &new_bh);
index af2566b274f589ad769993d549f0b7fe28073d62..f7cda20b29f028d5cf2367ef85c2a6f8da67ee97 100644 (file)
@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ pipe-fix-missing-lock-in-pipe_resize_ring.patch
 net-ipa-compute-proper-aggregation-limit.patch
 drm-i915-fix-wstringop-overflow-warning-in-call-to-intel_read_wm_latency.patch
 exfat-check-if-cluster-num-is-valid.patch
-exfat-fix-referencing-wrong-parent-directory-information-after-renaming.patch
 netfilter-nft_limit-clone-packet-limits-cost-value.patch
 netfilter-nf_tables-sanitize-nft_set_desc_concat_parse.patch
 netfilter-nf_tables-hold-mutex-on-netns-pre_exit-path.patch