--- /dev/null
+From 46c22a8bb4cb03211da1100d7ee4a2005bf77c70 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
+Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2025 13:44:46 +0530
+Subject: ext4: correctly handle queries for metadata mappings
+
+From: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
+
+commit 46c22a8bb4cb03211da1100d7ee4a2005bf77c70 upstream.
+
+Currently, our handling of metadata is _ambiguous_ in some scenarios,
+that is, we end up returning unknown if the range only covers the
+mapping partially.
+
+For example, in the following case:
+
+$ xfs_io -c fsmap -d
+
+ 0: 254:16 [0..7]: static fs metadata 8
+ 1: 254:16 [8..15]: special 102:1 8
+ 2: 254:16 [16..5127]: special 102:2 5112
+ 3: 254:16 [5128..5255]: special 102:3 128
+ 4: 254:16 [5256..5383]: special 102:4 128
+ 5: 254:16 [5384..70919]: inodes 65536
+ 6: 254:16 [70920..70967]: unknown 48
+ ...
+
+$ xfs_io -c fsmap -d 24 33
+
+ 0: 254:16 [24..39]: unknown 16 <--- incomplete reporting
+
+$ xfs_io -c fsmap -d 24 33 (With patch)
+
+ 0: 254:16 [16..5127]: special 102:2 5112
+
+This is because earlier in ext4_getfsmap_meta_helper, we end up ignoring
+any extent that starts before our queried range, but overlaps it. While
+the man page [1] is a bit ambiguous on this, this fix makes the output
+make more sense since we are anyways returning an "unknown" extent. This
+is also consistent to how XFS does it:
+
+$ xfs_io -c fsmap -d
+
+ ...
+ 6: 254:16 [104..127]: free space 24
+ 7: 254:16 [128..191]: inodes 64
+ ...
+
+$ xfs_io -c fsmap -d 137 150
+
+ 0: 254:16 [128..191]: inodes 64 <-- full extent returned
+
+ [1] https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/ioctl_getfsmap.2.html
+
+Reported-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
+Cc: stable@kernel.org
+Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
+Message-ID: <023f37e35ee280cd9baac0296cbadcbe10995cab.1757058211.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
+Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ fs/ext4/fsmap.c | 14 +++++++++-----
+ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/fs/ext4/fsmap.c
++++ b/fs/ext4/fsmap.c
+@@ -74,7 +74,8 @@ static int ext4_getfsmap_dev_compare(con
+ static bool ext4_getfsmap_rec_before_low_key(struct ext4_getfsmap_info *info,
+ struct ext4_fsmap *rec)
+ {
+- return rec->fmr_physical < info->gfi_low.fmr_physical;
++ return rec->fmr_physical + rec->fmr_length <=
++ info->gfi_low.fmr_physical;
+ }
+
+ /*
+@@ -200,15 +201,18 @@ static int ext4_getfsmap_meta_helper(str
+ ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, agno));
+ fs_end = fs_start + EXT4_C2B(sbi, len);
+
+- /* Return relevant extents from the meta_list */
++ /*
++ * Return relevant extents from the meta_list. We emit all extents that
++ * partially/fully overlap with the query range
++ */
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(p, tmp, &info->gfi_meta_list, fmr_list) {
+- if (p->fmr_physical < info->gfi_next_fsblk) {
++ if (p->fmr_physical + p->fmr_length <= info->gfi_next_fsblk) {
+ list_del(&p->fmr_list);
+ kfree(p);
+ continue;
+ }
+- if (p->fmr_physical <= fs_start ||
+- p->fmr_physical + p->fmr_length <= fs_end) {
++ if (p->fmr_physical <= fs_end &&
++ p->fmr_physical + p->fmr_length > fs_start) {
+ /* Emit the retained free extent record if present */
+ if (info->gfi_lastfree.fmr_owner) {
+ error = ext4_getfsmap_helper(sb, info,
--- /dev/null
+From 57295e835408d8d425bef58da5253465db3d6888 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Ahmet Eray Karadag <eraykrdg1@gmail.com>
+Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2025 05:13:43 +0300
+Subject: ext4: guard against EA inode refcount underflow in xattr update
+
+From: Ahmet Eray Karadag <eraykrdg1@gmail.com>
+
+commit 57295e835408d8d425bef58da5253465db3d6888 upstream.
+
+syzkaller found a path where ext4_xattr_inode_update_ref() reads an EA
+inode refcount that is already <= 0 and then applies ref_change (often
+-1). That lets the refcount underflow and we proceed with a bogus value,
+triggering errors like:
+
+ EXT4-fs error: EA inode <n> ref underflow: ref_count=-1 ref_change=-1
+ EXT4-fs warning: ea_inode dec ref err=-117
+
+Make the invariant explicit: if the current refcount is non-positive,
+treat this as on-disk corruption, emit ext4_error_inode(), and fail the
+operation with -EFSCORRUPTED instead of updating the refcount. Delete the
+WARN_ONCE() as negative refcounts are now impossible; keep error reporting
+in ext4_error_inode().
+
+This prevents the underflow and the follow-on orphan/cleanup churn.
+
+Reported-by: syzbot+0be4f339a8218d2a5bb1@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
+Fixes: https://syzbot.org/bug?extid=0be4f339a8218d2a5bb1
+Cc: stable@kernel.org
+Co-developed-by: Albin Babu Varghese <albinbabuvarghese20@gmail.com>
+Signed-off-by: Albin Babu Varghese <albinbabuvarghese20@gmail.com>
+Signed-off-by: Ahmet Eray Karadag <eraykrdg1@gmail.com>
+Message-ID: <20250920021342.45575-1-eraykrdg1@gmail.com>
+Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ fs/ext4/xattr.c | 15 ++++++++-------
+ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/fs/ext4/xattr.c
++++ b/fs/ext4/xattr.c
+@@ -987,7 +987,7 @@ static int ext4_xattr_inode_update_ref(h
+ int ref_change)
+ {
+ struct ext4_iloc iloc;
+- s64 ref_count;
++ u64 ref_count;
+ int ret;
+
+ inode_lock_nested(ea_inode, I_MUTEX_XATTR);
+@@ -997,13 +997,17 @@ static int ext4_xattr_inode_update_ref(h
+ goto out;
+
+ ref_count = ext4_xattr_inode_get_ref(ea_inode);
++ if ((ref_count == 0 && ref_change < 0) || (ref_count == U64_MAX && ref_change > 0)) {
++ ext4_error_inode(ea_inode, __func__, __LINE__, 0,
++ "EA inode %lu ref wraparound: ref_count=%lld ref_change=%d",
++ ea_inode->i_ino, ref_count, ref_change);
++ ret = -EFSCORRUPTED;
++ goto out;
++ }
+ ref_count += ref_change;
+ ext4_xattr_inode_set_ref(ea_inode, ref_count);
+
+ if (ref_change > 0) {
+- WARN_ONCE(ref_count <= 0, "EA inode %lu ref_count=%lld",
+- ea_inode->i_ino, ref_count);
+-
+ if (ref_count == 1) {
+ WARN_ONCE(ea_inode->i_nlink, "EA inode %lu i_nlink=%u",
+ ea_inode->i_ino, ea_inode->i_nlink);
+@@ -1012,9 +1016,6 @@ static int ext4_xattr_inode_update_ref(h
+ ext4_orphan_del(handle, ea_inode);
+ }
+ } else {
+- WARN_ONCE(ref_count < 0, "EA inode %lu ref_count=%lld",
+- ea_inode->i_ino, ref_count);
+-
+ if (ref_count == 0) {
+ WARN_ONCE(ea_inode->i_nlink != 1,
+ "EA inode %lu i_nlink=%u",
--- /dev/null
+From 9d80eaa1a1d37539224982b76c9ceeee736510b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Yongjian Sun <sunyongjian1@huawei.com>
+Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 21:30:24 +0800
+Subject: ext4: increase i_disksize to offset + len in ext4_update_disksize_before_punch()
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
+
+From: Yongjian Sun <sunyongjian1@huawei.com>
+
+commit 9d80eaa1a1d37539224982b76c9ceeee736510b9 upstream.
+
+After running a stress test combined with fault injection,
+we performed fsck -a followed by fsck -fn on the filesystem
+image. During the second pass, fsck -fn reported:
+
+Inode 131512, end of extent exceeds allowed value
+ (logical block 405, physical block 1180540, len 2)
+
+This inode was not in the orphan list. Analysis revealed the
+following call chain that leads to the inconsistency:
+
+ ext4_da_write_end()
+ //does not update i_disksize
+ ext4_punch_hole()
+ //truncate folio, keep size
+ext4_page_mkwrite()
+ ext4_block_page_mkwrite()
+ ext4_block_write_begin()
+ ext4_get_block()
+ //insert written extent without update i_disksize
+journal commit
+echo 1 > /sys/block/xxx/device/delete
+
+da-write path updates i_size but does not update i_disksize. Then
+ext4_punch_hole truncates the da-folio yet still leaves i_disksize
+unchanged(in the ext4_update_disksize_before_punch function, the
+condition offset + len < size is met). Then ext4_page_mkwrite sees
+ext4_nonda_switch return 1 and takes the nodioread_nolock path, the
+folio about to be written has just been punched out, and it’s offset
+sits beyond the current i_disksize. This may result in a written
+extent being inserted, but again does not update i_disksize. If the
+journal gets committed and then the block device is yanked, we might
+run into this. It should be noted that replacing ext4_punch_hole with
+ext4_zero_range in the call sequence may also trigger this issue, as
+neither will update i_disksize under these circumstances.
+
+To fix this, we can modify ext4_update_disksize_before_punch to
+increase i_disksize to min(i_size, offset + len) when both i_size and
+(offset + len) are greater than i_disksize.
+
+Cc: stable@kernel.org
+Signed-off-by: Yongjian Sun <sunyongjian1@huawei.com>
+Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
+Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
+Reviewed-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
+Message-ID: <20250911133024.1841027-1-sunyongjian@huaweicloud.com>
+Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ fs/ext4/inode.c | 10 ++++++++--
+ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
++++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
+@@ -3906,7 +3906,11 @@ int ext4_can_truncate(struct inode *inod
+ * We have to make sure i_disksize gets properly updated before we truncate
+ * page cache due to hole punching or zero range. Otherwise i_disksize update
+ * can get lost as it may have been postponed to submission of writeback but
+- * that will never happen after we truncate page cache.
++ * that will never happen if we remove the folio containing i_size from the
++ * page cache. Also if we punch hole within i_size but above i_disksize,
++ * following ext4_page_mkwrite() may mistakenly allocate written blocks over
++ * the hole and thus introduce allocated blocks beyond i_disksize which is
++ * not allowed (e2fsck would complain in case of crash).
+ */
+ int ext4_update_disksize_before_punch(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset,
+ loff_t len)
+@@ -3917,9 +3921,11 @@ int ext4_update_disksize_before_punch(st
+ loff_t size = i_size_read(inode);
+
+ WARN_ON(!inode_is_locked(inode));
+- if (offset > size || offset + len < size)
++ if (offset > size)
+ return 0;
+
++ if (offset + len < size)
++ size = offset + len;
+ if (EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize >= size)
+ return 0;
+
--- /dev/null
+From 0a6ce20c156442a4ce2a404747bb0fb05d54eeb3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
+Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 13:22:07 +0200
+Subject: ext4: verify orphan file size is not too big
+
+From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
+
+commit 0a6ce20c156442a4ce2a404747bb0fb05d54eeb3 upstream.
+
+In principle orphan file can be arbitrarily large. However orphan replay
+needs to traverse it all and we also pin all its buffers in memory. Thus
+filesystems with absurdly large orphan files can lead to big amounts of
+memory consumed. Limit orphan file size to a sane value and also use
+kvmalloc() for allocating array of block descriptor structures to avoid
+large order allocations for sane but large orphan files.
+
+Reported-by: syzbot+0b92850d68d9b12934f5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
+Fixes: 02f310fcf47f ("ext4: Speedup ext4 orphan inode handling")
+Cc: stable@kernel.org
+Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
+Message-ID: <20250909112206.10459-2-jack@suse.cz>
+Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ fs/ext4/orphan.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
+ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- a/fs/ext4/orphan.c
++++ b/fs/ext4/orphan.c
+@@ -584,9 +584,20 @@ int ext4_init_orphan_info(struct super_b
+ ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "get orphan inode failed");
+ return PTR_ERR(inode);
+ }
++ /*
++ * This is just an artificial limit to prevent corrupted fs from
++ * consuming absurd amounts of memory when pinning blocks of orphan
++ * file in memory.
++ */
++ if (inode->i_size > 8 << 20) {
++ ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "orphan file too big: %llu",
++ (unsigned long long)inode->i_size);
++ ret = -EFSCORRUPTED;
++ goto out_put;
++ }
+ oi->of_blocks = inode->i_size >> sb->s_blocksize_bits;
+ oi->of_csum_seed = EXT4_I(inode)->i_csum_seed;
+- oi->of_binfo = kmalloc_array(oi->of_blocks,
++ oi->of_binfo = kvmalloc_array(oi->of_blocks,
+ sizeof(struct ext4_orphan_block),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!oi->of_binfo) {
mm-page_alloc-only-set-alloc_highatomic-for-__gpf_high-allocations.patch
nfsd-fix-destination-buffer-size-in-nfsd4_ssc_setup_dul.patch
nfsd-nfserr_jukebox-in-nlm_fopen-should-lead-to-a-retry.patch
+ext4-verify-orphan-file-size-is-not-too-big.patch
+ext4-increase-i_disksize-to-offset-len-in-ext4_update_disksize_before_punch.patch
+ext4-correctly-handle-queries-for-metadata-mappings.patch
+ext4-guard-against-ea-inode-refcount-underflow-in-xattr-update.patch