The assert in function file_seek_cur_needs_f_lock() can be triggered very
easily because there are many users of vfs_llseek() (such as overlayfs)
that do their custom locking around llseek instead of relying on
fdget_pos(). Just drop the overzealous assertion.
Fixes: da06e3c51794 ("fs: don't needlessly acquire f_lock")
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Suggested-by: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis@igalia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250613101111.17716-1-luis@igalia.com
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
if (!(file->f_mode & FMODE_ATOMIC_POS) && !file->f_op->iterate_shared)
return false;
- VFS_WARN_ON_ONCE((file_count(file) > 1) &&
- !mutex_is_locked(&file->f_pos_lock));
+ /*
+ * Note that we are not guaranteed to be called after fdget_pos() on
+ * this file obj, in which case the caller is expected to provide the
+ * appropriate locking.
+ */
+
return true;
}