shows a `<<<<<<<` conflict marker, changes made by one side,
a `=======` marker, changes made by the other side, and then
a `>>>>>>>` marker. An alternate style, "diff3", adds a `|||||||`
- marker and the original text before the `=======` marker.
+ marker and the original text before the `=======` marker. The
+ "merge" style tends to produce smaller conflict regions than diff3,
+ both because of the exclusion of the original text, and because
+ when a subset of lines match on the two sides they are just pulled
+ out of the conflict region. Another alternate style, "zdiff3", is
+ similar to diff3 but removes matching lines on the two sides from
+ the conflict region when those matching lines appear near either
+ the beginning or end of a conflict region.
merge.defaultToUpstream::
If merge is called without any commit argument, merge the upstream
The same as `--merge` option above, but changes the way the
conflicting hunks are presented, overriding the
`merge.conflictStyle` configuration variable. Possible values are
- "merge" (default) and "diff3" (in addition to what is shown by
- "merge" style, shows the original contents).
+ "merge" (default), "diff3", and "zdiff3".
-p::
--patch::
--diff3::
Show conflicts in "diff3" style.
+--zdiff3::
+ Show conflicts in "zdiff3" style.
+
--ours::
--theirs::
--union::
------------
Here are lines that are either unchanged from the common
-ancestor, or cleanly resolved because only one side changed.
+ancestor, or cleanly resolved because only one side changed,
+or cleanly resolved because both sides changed the same way.
<<<<<<< yours:sample.txt
Conflict resolution is hard;
let's go shopping.
other side wants to claim it is easy.
An alternative style can be used by setting the "merge.conflictStyle"
-configuration variable to "diff3". In "diff3" style, the above conflict
-may look like this:
+configuration variable to either "diff3" or "zdiff3". In "diff3"
+style, the above conflict may look like this:
------------
Here are lines that are either unchanged from the common
-ancestor, or cleanly resolved because only one side changed.
+ancestor, or cleanly resolved because only one side changed,
<<<<<<< yours:sample.txt
+or cleanly resolved because both sides changed the same way.
Conflict resolution is hard;
let's go shopping.
-|||||||
+||||||| base:sample.txt
+or cleanly resolved because both sides changed identically.
+Conflict resolution is hard.
+=======
+or cleanly resolved because both sides changed the same way.
+Git makes conflict resolution easy.
+>>>>>>> theirs:sample.txt
+And here is another line that is cleanly resolved or unmodified.
+------------
+
+while in "zdiff3" style, it may look like this:
+
+------------
+Here are lines that are either unchanged from the common
+ancestor, or cleanly resolved because only one side changed,
+or cleanly resolved because both sides changed the same way.
+<<<<<<< yours:sample.txt
+Conflict resolution is hard;
+let's go shopping.
+||||||| base:sample.txt
+or cleanly resolved because both sides changed identically.
Conflict resolution is hard.
=======
Git makes conflict resolution easy.
generates new fake commits based off limited information in the
generated patches), those commits cannot be identified; instead it has
to fall back to a commit summary. Also, when merge.conflictStyle is
-set to diff3, the apply backend will use "constructed merge base" to
-label the content from the merge base, and thus provide no information
-about the merge base commit whatsoever.
+set to diff3 or zdiff3, the apply backend will use "constructed merge
+base" to label the content from the merge base, and thus provide no
+information about the merge base commit whatsoever.
The merge backend works with the full commits on both sides of history
and thus has no such limitations.
The same as `--merge` option above, but changes the way the
conflicting hunks are presented, overriding the
`merge.conflictStyle` configuration variable. Possible values
- are "merge" (default) and "diff3" (in addition to what is
- shown by "merge" style, shows the original contents).
+ are "merge" (default), "diff3", and "zdiff3".
--ignore-unmerged::
When restoring files on the working tree from the index, do
The same as `--merge` option above, but changes the way the
conflicting hunks are presented, overriding the
`merge.conflictStyle` configuration variable. Possible values are
- "merge" (default) and "diff3" (in addition to what is shown by
- "merge" style, shows the original contents).
+ "merge" (default), "diff3", and "zdiff3".
-q::
--quiet::
Different conflict styles and branch names are normalized by stripping
the labels from the conflict markers, and removing the common ancestor
-version from the `diff3` conflict style. Branches that are merged
-in different order are normalized by sorting the conflict hunks. More
-on each of those steps in the following sections.
+version from the `diff3` or `zdiff3` conflict styles. Branches that
+are merged in different order are normalized by sorting the conflict
+hunks. More on each of those steps in the following sections.
Once these two normalization operations are applied, a conflict ID is
calculated based on the normalized conflict, which is later used by
>>>>>>> AC
Doing the analogous with AC2 (forking a branch ABAC2 off of branch AB
-and then merging branch AC2 into it), using the diff3 conflict style,
-we get a conflict like the following:
+and then merging branch AC2 into it), using the diff3 or zdiff3
+conflict style, we get a conflict like the following:
<<<<<<< HEAD
B
OPT_BOOL(0, "progress", &opts->show_progress, N_("force progress reporting")),
OPT_BOOL('m', "merge", &opts->merge, N_("perform a 3-way merge with the new branch")),
OPT_STRING(0, "conflict", &opts->conflict_style, N_("style"),
- N_("conflict style (merge or diff3)")),
+ N_("conflict style (merge, diff3, or zdiff3)")),
OPT_END()
};
struct option *newopts = parse_options_concat(prevopts, options);