+2004-11-13 Kazu Hirata <kazu@cs.umass.edu>
+
+ * bitmap.c, bitmap.h, expmed.c, tree-cfg.c: Fix comment
+ formatting.
+
2004-11-13 Kelley Cook <kcook@gcc.gnu.org>
* doc/install.texi (automake): Correctly document that everything now
}
\f
-/* DST = A & B. */
+/* DST = A & B. */
void
bitmap_and (bitmap dst, bitmap a, bitmap b)
{
if (!b_elt || a_elt->indx < b_elt->indx)
{
- /* Copy a_elt. */
+ /* Copy a_elt. */
if (!dst_elt)
dst_elt = bitmap_elt_insert_after (dst, dst_prev);
bi->elt2 = bi->elt2->next;
}
- /* If we're at the same index, then we have some intersecting bits. */
+ /* If we're at the same index, then we have some intersecting bits. */
if (bi->elt1->indx == bi->elt2->indx)
{
/* We might have advanced beyond the start_bit, so reinitialize
unsigned int sign_shift_up, sign_shift_dn;
rtx base, a1, a2, v1, v2, comb, shift, result, start;
- /* Choose a mode that will fit BITSIZE. */
+ /* Choose a mode that will fit BITSIZE. */
mode = smallest_mode_for_size (bitsize, MODE_INT);
m_size = GET_MODE_SIZE (mode);
m_bitsize = GET_MODE_BITSIZE (mode);
The requirement for no PHI nodes could be relaxed. Basically we
would have to examine the PHIs to prove that none of them used
- the value set by the statement we want to insert on E. That
+ the value set by the statement we want to insert on E. That
hardly seems worth the effort. */
if (EDGE_COUNT (dest->preds) == 1
&& ! phi_nodes (dest)
There is precisely one CASE_LABEL_EXPR in the switch vector
which needs updating. Either its label needs to be updated
- or it needs to be directed to a new case leader. */
+ or it needs to be directed to a new case leader. */
e2 = find_edge (e->src, dest);
if (e2)
{
/* In this case we need to change the case leader for the
- current leader of E to be the case leader for E2. */
+ current leader of E to be the case leader for E2. */
tree e_leader = get_case_leader_for_edge (e);
tree e2_leader = get_case_leader_for_edge (e2);
CASE_LEADER_OR_LABEL (e_leader) = e2_leader;