--- /dev/null
+From cc8f7fe1f5eab010191aa4570f27641876fa1267 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Haimin Zhang <tcs.kernel@gmail.com>
+Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 16:40:38 +0800
+Subject: block-map: add __GFP_ZERO flag for alloc_page in function bio_copy_kern
+
+From: Haimin Zhang <tcs.kernel@gmail.com>
+
+commit cc8f7fe1f5eab010191aa4570f27641876fa1267 upstream.
+
+Add __GFP_ZERO flag for alloc_page in function bio_copy_kern to initialize
+the buffer of a bio.
+
+Signed-off-by: Haimin Zhang <tcs.kernel@gmail.com>
+Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
+Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
+Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220216084038.15635-1-tcs.kernel@gmail.com
+Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
+[DP: Backported to 4.19: Manually added __GFP_ZERO flag]
+Signed-off-by: Dragos-Marian Panait <dragos.panait@windriver.com>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ block/bio.c | 2 +-
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- a/block/bio.c
++++ b/block/bio.c
+@@ -1538,7 +1538,7 @@ struct bio *bio_copy_kern(struct request
+ if (bytes > len)
+ bytes = len;
+
+- page = alloc_page(q->bounce_gfp | gfp_mask);
++ page = alloc_page(q->bounce_gfp | __GFP_ZERO | gfp_mask);
+ if (!page)
+ goto cleanup;
+
--- /dev/null
+From 336feb502a715909a8136eb6a62a83d7268a353b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
+Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 17:47:14 -0500
+Subject: drm/i915: Fix -Wstringop-overflow warning in call to intel_read_wm_latency()
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
+
+From: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
+
+commit 336feb502a715909a8136eb6a62a83d7268a353b upstream.
+
+Fix the following -Wstringop-overflow warnings when building with GCC-11:
+
+drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:3106:9: warning: ‘intel_read_wm_latency’ accessing 16 bytes in a region of size 10 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
+ 3106 | intel_read_wm_latency(dev_priv, dev_priv->wm.pri_latency);
+ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:3106:9: note: referencing argument 2 of type ‘u16 *’ {aka ‘short unsigned int *’}
+drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:2861:13: note: in a call to function ‘intel_read_wm_latency’
+ 2861 | static void intel_read_wm_latency(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
+ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+by removing the over-specified array size from the argument declarations.
+
+It seems that this code is actually safe because the size of the
+array depends on the hardware generation, and the function checks
+for that.
+
+Notice that wm can be an array of 5 elements:
+drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:3109: intel_read_wm_latency(dev_priv, dev_priv->wm.pri_latency);
+
+or an array of 8 elements:
+drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:3131: intel_read_wm_latency(dev_priv, dev_priv->wm.skl_latency);
+
+and the compiler legitimately complains about that.
+
+This helps with the ongoing efforts to globally enable
+-Wstringop-overflow.
+
+Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/181
+Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 2 +-
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
++++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+@@ -2083,7 +2083,7 @@ hsw_compute_linetime_wm(const struct int
+ PIPE_WM_LINETIME_TIME(linetime);
+ }
+
+-static void intel_read_wm_latency(struct drm_device *dev, uint16_t wm[8])
++static void intel_read_wm_latency(struct drm_device *dev, uint16_t wm[])
+ {
+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
+
--- /dev/null
+From dcd46d897adb70d63e025f175a00a89797d31a43 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
+Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 16:09:47 -0800
+Subject: exec: Force single empty string when argv is empty
+
+From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
+
+commit dcd46d897adb70d63e025f175a00a89797d31a43 upstream.
+
+Quoting[1] Ariadne Conill:
+
+"In several other operating systems, it is a hard requirement that the
+second argument to execve(2) be the name of a program, thus prohibiting
+a scenario where argc < 1. POSIX 2017 also recommends this behaviour,
+but it is not an explicit requirement[2]:
+
+ The argument arg0 should point to a filename string that is
+ associated with the process being started by one of the exec
+ functions.
+...
+Interestingly, Michael Kerrisk opened an issue about this in 2008[3],
+but there was no consensus to support fixing this issue then.
+Hopefully now that CVE-2021-4034 shows practical exploitative use[4]
+of this bug in a shellcode, we can reconsider.
+
+This issue is being tracked in the KSPP issue tracker[5]."
+
+While the initial code searches[6][7] turned up what appeared to be
+mostly corner case tests, trying to that just reject argv == NULL
+(or an immediately terminated pointer list) quickly started tripping[8]
+existing userspace programs.
+
+The next best approach is forcing a single empty string into argv and
+adjusting argc to match. The number of programs depending on argc == 0
+seems a smaller set than those calling execve with a NULL argv.
+
+Account for the additional stack space in bprm_stack_limits(). Inject an
+empty string when argc == 0 (and set argc = 1). Warn about the case so
+userspace has some notice about the change:
+
+ process './argc0' launched './argc0' with NULL argv: empty string added
+
+Additionally WARN() and reject NULL argv usage for kernel threads.
+
+[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220127000724.15106-1-ariadne@dereferenced.org/
+[2] https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/exec.html
+[3] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8408
+[4] https://www.qualys.com/2022/01/25/cve-2021-4034/pwnkit.txt
+[5] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/176
+[6] https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=execve%5C+*%5C%28%5B%5E%2C%5D%2B%2C+*NULL&literal=0
+[7] https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=execlp%3F%5Cs*%5C%28%5B%5E%2C%5D%2B%2C%5Cs*NULL&literal=0
+[8] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220131144352.GE16385@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/
+
+Reported-by: Ariadne Conill <ariadne@dereferenced.org>
+Reported-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
+Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
+Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
+Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
+Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
+Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
+Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
+Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
+Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
+Acked-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
+Acked-by: Ariadne Conill <ariadne@dereferenced.org>
+Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
+Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220201000947.2453721-1-keescook@chromium.org
+[vegard: fixed conflicts due to missing
+ 886d7de631da71e30909980fdbf318f7caade262^- and
+ 3950e975431bc914f7e81b8f2a2dbdf2064acb0f^- and
+ 655c16a8ce9c15842547f40ce23fd148aeccc074]
+Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ fs/exec.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
+ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
+
+This has been tested in both argc == 0 and argc >= 1 cases, but I would
+still appreciate a review given the differences with mainline. If it's
+considered too risky I'm also fine with dropping it -- just wanted to
+make sure this didn't fall through the cracks, as it does block a real
+(albeit old by now) exploit.
+
+--- a/fs/exec.c
++++ b/fs/exec.c
+@@ -1758,6 +1758,9 @@ static int do_execveat_common(int fd, st
+ goto out_unmark;
+
+ bprm->argc = count(argv, MAX_ARG_STRINGS);
++ if (bprm->argc == 0)
++ pr_warn_once("process '%s' launched '%s' with NULL argv: empty string added\n",
++ current->comm, bprm->filename);
+ if ((retval = bprm->argc) < 0)
+ goto out;
+
+@@ -1782,6 +1785,20 @@ static int do_execveat_common(int fd, st
+ if (retval < 0)
+ goto out;
+
++ /*
++ * When argv is empty, add an empty string ("") as argv[0] to
++ * ensure confused userspace programs that start processing
++ * from argv[1] won't end up walking envp. See also
++ * bprm_stack_limits().
++ */
++ if (bprm->argc == 0) {
++ const char *argv[] = { "", NULL };
++ retval = copy_strings_kernel(1, argv, bprm);
++ if (retval < 0)
++ goto out;
++ bprm->argc = 1;
++ }
++
+ retval = exec_binprm(bprm);
+ if (retval < 0)
+ goto out;