Fix nptl/tst-kill5 not to presume SIGRTMAX exists.

diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index c28f7e542ed15ddd5d34a62c2f8702a9ffdc43c8..4ca6759f424e422c2fbef757de7f87261cfd6f4d 100644 (file)
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
 2015-02-06  Roland McGrath  <roland@hack.frob.com>
 
+       * nptl/tst-kill5.c (do_test): Use INT_MAX rather than SIGRTMAX + 10.
+
        * nptl/tst-join5.c: Drop #include <sys/syscall.h>.
        (wait_code): New function replaces macro.
        Call nanosleep rather than syscall.

diff --git a/nptl/tst-kill5.c b/nptl/tst-kill5.c
index f16aae9512e2451583703fd8586b511d6151dd6f..0717c039d9dee933073cd9e7902855a7418081d3 100644 (file)
--- a/nptl/tst-kill5.c
+++ b/nptl/tst-kill5.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
 #include <signal.h>
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include <stdlib.h>
+#include <limits.h>
 
 
 int
@@ -28,7 +29,7 @@ do_test (void)
 {
   /* XXX This test might require architecture and system specific changes.
      There is no guarantee that this signal number is invalid.  */
-  int e = pthread_kill (pthread_self (), SIGRTMAX + 10);
+  int e = pthread_kill (pthread_self (), INT_MAX);
   if (e == 0)
     {
       puts ("kill didn't failed");