--- /dev/null
+From 6ad244d326948613e17b00fe43ccf27cff206cce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
+Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2023 13:28:45 +1030
+Subject: btrfs: make found_logical_ret parameter mandatory for function
+ queue_scrub_stripe()
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
+
+From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
+
+[ Upstream commit 47e2b06b7b5cb356a987ba3429550c3a89ea89d6 ]
+
+[BUG]
+There is a compilation warning reported on commit ae76d8e3e135 ("btrfs:
+scrub: fix grouping of read IO"), where gcc (14.0.0 20231022 experimental)
+is reporting the following uninitialized variable:
+
+ fs/btrfs/scrub.c: In function ‘scrub_simple_mirror.isra’:
+ fs/btrfs/scrub.c:2075:29: error: ‘found_logical’ may be used uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized[https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html#index-Wmaybe-uninitialized]]
+ 2075 | cur_logical = found_logical + BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN;
+ fs/btrfs/scrub.c:2040:21: note: ‘found_logical’ was declared here
+ 2040 | u64 found_logical;
+ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+[CAUSE]
+This is a false alert, as @found_logical is passed as parameter
+@found_logical_ret of function queue_scrub_stripe().
+
+As long as queue_scrub_stripe() returned 0, we would update
+@found_logical_ret. And if queue_scrub_stripe() returned >0 or <0, the
+caller would not utilized @found_logical, thus there should be nothing
+wrong.
+
+Although the triggering gcc is still experimental, it looks like the
+extra check on "if (found_logical_ret)" can sometimes confuse the
+compiler.
+
+Meanwhile the only caller of queue_scrub_stripe() is always passing a
+valid pointer, there is no need for such check at all.
+
+[FIX]
+Although the report itself is a false alert, we can still make it more
+explicit by:
+
+- Replace the check for @found_logical_ret with ASSERT()
+
+- Initialize @found_logical to U64_MAX
+
+- Add one extra ASSERT() to make sure @found_logical got updated
+
+Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/87fs1x1p93.fsf@gentoo.org/
+Fixes: ae76d8e3e135 ("btrfs: scrub: fix grouping of read IO")
+Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
+Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
+Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
+Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
+Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
+---
+ fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 10 +++++++---
+ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
+index b877203f1dc5a..4445a52a07076 100644
+--- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
++++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
+@@ -1798,6 +1798,9 @@ static int queue_scrub_stripe(struct scrub_ctx *sctx, struct btrfs_block_group *
+ */
+ ASSERT(sctx->cur_stripe < SCRUB_TOTAL_STRIPES);
+
++ /* @found_logical_ret must be specified. */
++ ASSERT(found_logical_ret);
++
+ stripe = &sctx->stripes[sctx->cur_stripe];
+ scrub_reset_stripe(stripe);
+ ret = scrub_find_fill_first_stripe(bg, &sctx->extent_path,
+@@ -1806,8 +1809,7 @@ static int queue_scrub_stripe(struct scrub_ctx *sctx, struct btrfs_block_group *
+ /* Either >0 as no more extents or <0 for error. */
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+- if (found_logical_ret)
+- *found_logical_ret = stripe->logical;
++ *found_logical_ret = stripe->logical;
+ sctx->cur_stripe++;
+
+ /* We filled one group, submit it. */
+@@ -2010,7 +2012,7 @@ static int scrub_simple_mirror(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
+
+ /* Go through each extent items inside the logical range */
+ while (cur_logical < logical_end) {
+- u64 found_logical;
++ u64 found_logical = U64_MAX;
+ u64 cur_physical = physical + cur_logical - logical_start;
+
+ /* Canceled? */
+@@ -2045,6 +2047,8 @@ static int scrub_simple_mirror(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
+ if (ret < 0)
+ break;
+
++ /* queue_scrub_stripe() returned 0, @found_logical must be updated. */
++ ASSERT(found_logical != U64_MAX);
+ cur_logical = found_logical + BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN;
+
+ /* Don't hold CPU for too long time */
+--
+2.42.0
+
--- /dev/null
+From 977f5a8b918e6dc72ca753e070f9721e22c7c4ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
+Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 10:05:48 +0100
+Subject: btrfs: use u64 for buffer sizes in the tree search ioctls
+
+From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
+
+[ Upstream commit dec96fc2dcb59723e041416b8dc53e011b4bfc2e ]
+
+In the tree search v2 ioctl we use the type size_t, which is an unsigned
+long, to track the buffer size in the local variable 'buf_size'. An
+unsigned long is 32 bits wide on a 32 bits architecture. The buffer size
+defined in struct btrfs_ioctl_search_args_v2 is a u64, so when we later
+try to copy the local variable 'buf_size' to the argument struct, when
+the search returns -EOVERFLOW, we copy only 32 bits which will be a
+problem on big endian systems.
+
+Fix this by using a u64 type for the buffer sizes, not only at
+btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2(), but also everywhere down the call chain
+so that we can use the u64 at btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2().
+
+Fixes: cc68a8a5a433 ("btrfs: new ioctl TREE_SEARCH_V2")
+Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
+Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/ce6f4bd6-9453-4ffe-ba00-cee35495e10f@moroto.mountain/
+Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
+Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
+Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
+Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
+---
+ fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 10 +++++-----
+ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
+index 8e7d03bc1b565..200dd780bc06f 100644
+--- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
++++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
+@@ -1528,7 +1528,7 @@ static noinline int key_in_sk(struct btrfs_key *key,
+ static noinline int copy_to_sk(struct btrfs_path *path,
+ struct btrfs_key *key,
+ struct btrfs_ioctl_search_key *sk,
+- size_t *buf_size,
++ u64 *buf_size,
+ char __user *ubuf,
+ unsigned long *sk_offset,
+ int *num_found)
+@@ -1660,7 +1660,7 @@ static noinline int copy_to_sk(struct btrfs_path *path,
+
+ static noinline int search_ioctl(struct inode *inode,
+ struct btrfs_ioctl_search_key *sk,
+- size_t *buf_size,
++ u64 *buf_size,
+ char __user *ubuf)
+ {
+ struct btrfs_fs_info *info = btrfs_sb(inode->i_sb);
+@@ -1733,7 +1733,7 @@ static noinline int btrfs_ioctl_tree_search(struct inode *inode,
+ struct btrfs_ioctl_search_args __user *uargs = argp;
+ struct btrfs_ioctl_search_key sk;
+ int ret;
+- size_t buf_size;
++ u64 buf_size;
+
+ if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
+ return -EPERM;
+@@ -1763,8 +1763,8 @@ static noinline int btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2(struct inode *inode,
+ struct btrfs_ioctl_search_args_v2 __user *uarg = argp;
+ struct btrfs_ioctl_search_args_v2 args;
+ int ret;
+- size_t buf_size;
+- const size_t buf_limit = SZ_16M;
++ u64 buf_size;
++ const u64 buf_limit = SZ_16M;
+
+ if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
+ return -EPERM;
+--
+2.42.0
+