--- /dev/null
+From eefb45eef5c4c425e87667af8f5e904fbdd47abf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Chinmay Agarwal <chinagar@codeaurora.org>
+Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 01:12:22 +0530
+Subject: neighbour: Prevent Race condition in neighbour subsytem
+
+From: Chinmay Agarwal <chinagar@codeaurora.org>
+
+commit eefb45eef5c4c425e87667af8f5e904fbdd47abf upstream.
+
+Following Race Condition was detected:
+
+<CPU A, t0>: Executing: __netif_receive_skb() ->__netif_receive_skb_core()
+-> arp_rcv() -> arp_process().arp_process() calls __neigh_lookup() which
+takes a reference on neighbour entry 'n'.
+Moves further along, arp_process() and calls neigh_update()->
+__neigh_update(). Neighbour entry is unlocked just before a call to
+neigh_update_gc_list.
+
+This unlocking paves way for another thread that may take a reference on
+the same and mark it dead and remove it from gc_list.
+
+<CPU B, t1> - neigh_flush_dev() is under execution and calls
+neigh_mark_dead(n) marking the neighbour entry 'n' as dead. Also n will be
+removed from gc_list.
+Moves further along neigh_flush_dev() and calls
+neigh_cleanup_and_release(n), but since reference count increased in t1,
+'n' couldn't be destroyed.
+
+<CPU A, t3>- Code hits neigh_update_gc_list, with neighbour entry
+set as dead.
+
+<CPU A, t4> - arp_process() finally calls neigh_release(n), destroying
+the neighbour entry and we have a destroyed ntry still part of gc_list.
+
+Fixes: eb4e8fac00d1("neighbour: Prevent a dead entry from updating gc_list")
+Signed-off-by: Chinmay Agarwal <chinagar@codeaurora.org>
+Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ net/core/neighbour.c | 4 ++++
+ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
+
+--- a/net/core/neighbour.c
++++ b/net/core/neighbour.c
+@@ -132,6 +132,9 @@ static void neigh_update_gc_list(struct
+ write_lock_bh(&n->tbl->lock);
+ write_lock(&n->lock);
+
++ if (n->dead)
++ goto out;
++
+ /* remove from the gc list if new state is permanent or if neighbor
+ * is externally learned; otherwise entry should be on the gc list
+ */
+@@ -148,6 +151,7 @@ static void neigh_update_gc_list(struct
+ atomic_inc(&n->tbl->gc_entries);
+ }
+
++out:
+ write_unlock(&n->lock);
+ write_unlock_bh(&n->tbl->lock);
+ }