pflash_cfi01: Fix warning caused by unreachable code

Report from smatch:
hw/pflash_cfi01.c:431 pflash_write(180) info: ignoring unreachable code.

Instead of removing the return statement after the switch statement,
the patch replaces the return statements in the switch statement by
break statements. Other switch statements in the same code do it also
like that.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 12dabc79f976d66755025272f7e2e8e4da31715a)

Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

diff --git a/hw/pflash_cfi01.c b/hw/pflash_cfi01.c
index d56b51abe62adaac7462d1a19c348bb443cbf9d6..ac503cfa09f38dfdc19456cd36379347e0cd3280 100644 (file)
--- a/hw/pflash_cfi01.c
+++ b/hw/pflash_cfi01.c
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ static void pflash_write(pflash_t *pfl, target_phys_addr_t offset,
         }
         pfl->wcycle++;
         pfl->cmd = cmd;
-        return;
+        break;
     case 1:
         switch (pfl->cmd) {
         case 0x10: /* Single Byte Program */
@@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ static void pflash_write(pflash_t *pfl, target_phys_addr_t offset,
         default:
             goto error_flash;
         }
-        return;
+        break;
     case 2:
         switch (pfl->cmd) {
         case 0xe8: /* Block write */
@@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ static void pflash_write(pflash_t *pfl, target_phys_addr_t offset,
         default:
             goto error_flash;
         }
-        return;
+        break;
     case 3: /* Confirm mode */
         switch (pfl->cmd) {
         case 0xe8: /* Block write */
@@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ static void pflash_write(pflash_t *pfl, target_phys_addr_t offset,
         default:
             goto error_flash;
         }
-        return;
+        break;
     default:
         /* Should never happen */
         DPRINTF("%s: invalid write state\n",  __func__);