Following on from PR 22929, I have found the same problem exists with
other ifunc supporting targets too. Plus see this link for the bug
being reported against the s390x binutils for Fedora rawhide:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=
1553705
So I am going to check in the patch below which applies the same
change that H.J. made for the x86_64 target to the other affected
targets. (Specifically: S390, AArch64 and Sparc). Plus it adds a new
test to the linker testsuite to make sure that this problem stays
fixed.
bfd * elf64-s390.c (elf_s390_relocate_section): Move check for
relocations against non-allocated sections to before the code that
handles ifunc relocations.
* elf32-s390.c (elf_s390_relocate_section): Likewise.
* elfnn-aarch64.c (elfNN_aarch64_final_link_relocate): Treat
relocs against IFUNC symbols in non-allocated sections as relocs
against FUNC symbols.
* elfxx-sparc.c (_bfd_sparc_elf_relocate_section): Likewise.
ld * testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifuncmod5.s: New test. Checks that targets
that support IFUNC symbols can handle relocations against those
symbols in NOTE sections.
* testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifuncmod5.d: New file: Driver for the new
test.
* testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc.exp: Run the new test.
+2018-03-09 Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
+
+ * elf64-s390.c (elf_s390_relocate_section): Move check for
+ relocations against non-allocated sections to before the code that
+ handles ifunc relocations.
+ * elf32-s390.c (elf_s390_relocate_section): Likewise.
+ * elfnn-aarch64.c (elfNN_aarch64_final_link_relocate): Treat
+ relocs against IFUNC symbols in non-allocated sections as relocs
+ against FUNC symbols.
+ * elfxx-sparc.c (_bfd_sparc_elf_relocate_section): Likewise.
+
2018-03-08 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
PR ld/22929
case R_390_8:
case R_390_16:
case R_390_32:
+ if ((input_section->flags & SEC_ALLOC) == 0)
+ break;
+
if (h != NULL
&& s390_is_ifunc_symbol_p (h)
&& h->def_regular)
}
}
- if ((input_section->flags & SEC_ALLOC) == 0)
- break;
-
if ((bfd_link_pic (info)
&& (h == NULL
|| (ELF_ST_VISIBILITY (h->other) == STV_DEFAULT
case R_390_32:
case R_390_64:
+ if ((input_section->flags & SEC_ALLOC) == 0)
+ break;
+
if (h != NULL
&& s390_is_ifunc_symbol_p (h)
&& h->def_regular)
}
}
- if ((input_section->flags & SEC_ALLOC) == 0)
- break;
-
if ((bfd_link_pic (info)
&& (h == NULL
|| (ELF_ST_VISIBILITY (h->other) == STV_DEFAULT
if ((input_section->flags & SEC_ALLOC) == 0)
{
+ /* If this is a SHT_NOTE section without SHF_ALLOC, treat
+ STT_GNU_IFUNC symbol as STT_FUNC. */
+ if (elf_section_type (input_section) == SHT_NOTE)
+ goto skip_ifunc;
+
/* Dynamic relocs are not propagated for SEC_DEBUGGING
sections because such sections are not SEC_ALLOC and
thus ld.so will not process them. */
}
}
+ skip_ifunc:
resolved_to_zero = (h != NULL
&& UNDEFWEAK_NO_DYNAMIC_RELOC (info, h));
if ((input_section->flags & SEC_ALLOC) == 0
|| h->plt.offset == (bfd_vma) -1)
- abort ();
+ {
+ /* If this is a SHT_NOTE section without SHF_ALLOC, treat
+ STT_GNU_IFUNC symbol as STT_FUNC. */
+ if (elf_section_type (input_section) == SHT_NOTE)
+ goto skip_ifunc;
+ abort ();
+ }
plt_sec = htab->elf.splt;
if (! plt_sec)
}
}
+ skip_ifunc:
eh = (struct _bfd_sparc_elf_link_hash_entry *) h;
resolved_to_zero = eh && UNDEFINED_WEAK_RESOLVED_TO_ZERO (info, eh);
+2018-03-09 Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
+
+ * testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifuncmod5.s: New test. Checks that targets
+ that support IFUNC symbols can handle relocations against those
+ symbols in NOTE sections.
+ * testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifuncmod5.d: New file: Driver for the new
+ test.
+ * testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc.exp: Run the new test.
+
2018-03-08 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
PR ld/22929
return
}
+# This test does not need a compiler...
+run_dump_test "ifuncmod5"
+
# We need a working compiler. (Strictly speaking this is
# not true, we could use target specific assembler files).
if { [which $CC] == 0 } {
--- /dev/null
+# name: Reloc against IFUNC symbol in NOTE section
+# ld: -shared
+# nm: -p
+
+# We do not actually care about the notes at the moment.
+# The purpose of this test is to make sure that the link completes successfully.
+#pass
+
--- /dev/null
+ .file "ifuncmod5.c"
+
+ .text
+ .type ifuncmod5.c, STT_NOTYPE
+ifuncmod5.c:
+ .size ifuncmod5.c, 0
+
+ .pushsection .gnu.build.attributes, "", %note
+ .balign 4
+ .dc.l 8
+ .dc.l 16
+ .dc.l 0x100
+ .asciz "GA$\ 13p4"
+ .dc.a ifuncmod5.c
+ .dc.a ifuncmod5.c_end
+ .popsection
+
+.Ltext0:
+#APP
+ .protected global
+ .type foo, %gnu_indirect_function
+ .type foo_hidden, %gnu_indirect_function
+ .type foo_protected, %gnu_indirect_function
+ .hidden foo_hidden
+ .protected foo_protected
+#NO_APP
+ .align 8
+ .type one, %function
+one:
+ .dc.l 0
+ .size one, .-one
+ .align 8
+
+.globl foo
+ .type foo, %function
+foo:
+ .dc.l 0
+ .size foo, .-foo
+
+ .pushsection .gnu.build.attributes
+ .dc.l 6
+ .dc.l 16
+ .dc.l 0x101
+ .dc.b 0x47, 0x41, 0x2a, 0x2, 0, 0
+ .dc.b 0, 0
+ .dc.a foo
+ .dc.a foo_end
+ .popsection
+
+foo_end:
+ .align 8
+.globl foo_hidden
+ .type foo_hidden, %function
+foo_hidden:
+ .dc.l 0
+ .size foo_hidden, .-foo_hidden
+
+ .pushsection .gnu.build.attributes
+ .dc.l 6
+ .dc.l 16
+ .dc.l 0x101
+ .dc.b 0x47, 0x41, 0x2a, 0x2, 0, 0
+ .dc.b 0, 0
+ .dc.a foo_hidden
+ .dc.a foo_hidden_end
+ .popsection
+
+foo_hidden_end:
+ .align 8
+
+ .globl foo_protected
+ .type foo_protected, %function
+foo_protected:
+ .dc.l 0
+
+ .size foo_protected, .-foo_protected
+
+ .pushsection .gnu.build.attributes
+ .dc.l 6
+ .dc.l 16
+ .dc.l 0x101
+ .dc.b 0x47, 0x41, 0x2a, 0x2, 0, 0
+ .dc.b 0, 0
+ .dc.a foo_protected
+ .dc.a foo_protected_end
+ .popsection
+
+foo_protected_end:
+ .globl global
+
+ .data
+ .align 4
+ .type global, %object
+ .size global, 4
+global:
+ .long -1
+
+ .text
+ .Letext0:
+
+ifuncmod5.c_end:
+ .type ifuncmod5.c_end, STT_NOTYPE
+ .size ifuncmod5.c_end, 0
+
+
projects / thirdparty / binutils-gdb.git / commitdiff
