+2009-12-21 Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
+
+ PR gdb/10884
+
+ * gdb.mi/var-cmd.c (do_bitfield_tests): New
+ (main): Call do_bitfield_tests.
+ * gdb.mi/mi-var-cmd.exp: Run the 'bitfield' testcase.
+
2009-12-21 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
* gdb.base/foll-fork.exp (unpatch child, breakpoint at exit call):
mi_prepare_inline_tests $srcfile
mi_run_inline_test frozen
+mi_run_inline_test bitfield
+
# Since the inline test framework does not really work with
# function calls, first to inline tests and then do the reminder
# manually.
/*: END: floating :*/
}
+/* Some header appear to define uint already, so apply some
+ uglification. Note that without uglification, the compile
+ does not fail, rather, we don't test what we want because
+ something else calls check_typedef on 'uint' already. */
+typedef unsigned int uint_for_mi_testing;
+
+struct Data {
+ int alloc;
+ uint_for_mi_testing sharable : 4;
+};
+
+/* Accessing a value of a bitfield whose type is a typed used to
+ result in division by zero. See:
+
+ http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10884
+
+ This tests for this bug. */
+
+void do_bitfield_tests ()
+{
+ /*: BEGIN: bitfield :*/
+ struct Data d = {0, 3};
+ /*:
+ mi_create_varobj V d "create varobj for Data"
+ mi_list_varobj_children "V" {
+ {"V.alloc" "alloc" "0" "int"}
+ {"V.sharable" "sharable" "0" "unsigned int"}
+ } "list children of Data"
+ mi_check_varobj_value V.sharable 3 "access bitfield"
+ :*/
+ return;
+ /*: END: bitfield :*/
+}
+
int
main (int argc, char *argv [])
{
do_special_tests ();
do_frozen_tests ();
do_at_tests ();
+ do_bitfield_tests ();
exit (0);
}