padata: switch padata_find_next() to using cpumask_next_wrap()

Calling cpumask_next_wrap_old() with starting CPU == -1 effectively means
the request to find next CPU, wrapping around if needed.

cpumask_next_wrap() is the proper replacement for that.

Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Acked-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>

diff --git a/kernel/padata.c b/kernel/padata.c
index 78e202fabf90ad579de1d7bf00e82f72b2ed634b..b3d4eacc4f5d8c7aa1673a92571a8095a2462add 100644 (file)
--- a/kernel/padata.c
+++ b/kernel/padata.c
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ static struct padata_priv *padata_find_next(struct parallel_data *pd,
        if (remove_object) {
                list_del_init(&padata->list);
                ++pd->processed;
-               pd->cpu = cpumask_next_wrap_old(cpu, pd->cpumask.pcpu, -1, false);
+               pd->cpu = cpumask_next_wrap(cpu, pd->cpumask.pcpu);
        }
 
        spin_unlock(&reorder->lock);