It is not necessary to resume the device upfront in acpi_tad_remove()
because both acpi_tad_disable_timer() and acpi_tad_clear_status()
attempt to resume it, but it is better to prevent it from suspending
between these calls by incrementing its runtime PM usage counter.
Accordingly, replace the pm_runtime_get_sync() call in acpi_tad_remove()
with a pm_runtime_get_noresume() one and put the latter right before the
first invocation of acpi_tad_disable_timer().
In addition, use pm_runtime_put_noidle() to drop the device's runtime
PM usage counter after using pm_runtime_get_noresume() to bump it up
to follow a common pattern and use pm_runtime_suspend() for suspending
the device afterward.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/5031965.GXAFRqVoOG@rafael.j.wysocki
device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
- pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
-
if (dd->capabilities & ACPI_TAD_RT)
sysfs_remove_group(&dev->kobj, &acpi_tad_time_attr_group);
sysfs_remove_group(&dev->kobj, &acpi_tad_attr_group);
+ pm_runtime_get_noresume(dev);
+
acpi_tad_disable_timer(dev, ACPI_TAD_AC_TIMER);
acpi_tad_clear_status(dev, ACPI_TAD_AC_TIMER);
if (dd->capabilities & ACPI_TAD_DC_WAKE) {
acpi_tad_clear_status(dev, ACPI_TAD_DC_TIMER);
}
- pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
+ pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev);
+ pm_runtime_suspend(dev);
pm_runtime_disable(dev);
acpi_remove_cmos_rtc_space_handler(handle);
}