https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=
1439132
Commit id '
a48c674fb' added a check for format types "dvh" and "pc98"
to use the parted print processing instead of using blkid processing
in order to validate the label on the disk was what is expected for
disk pool startup. However, commit id '
a4cb4a74f' really messed things
up by missing an else condition causing PARTEDFindLabel to always
return DIFFERENT.
Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit
f2a123203105b4fe010aea866e87f8bcf5f31193)
/* Does the on disk match what the pool desired? */
if (STREQ(start, format))
ret = VIR_STORAGE_PARTED_MATCH;
-
- ret = VIR_STORAGE_PARTED_DIFFERENT;
+ else
+ ret = VIR_STORAGE_PARTED_DIFFERENT;
cleanup:
virCommandFree(cmd);