gcc has always had hallucinations regarding value ranges, and this one
is interesting, and affects branches 4.7 to 11.3 at least. When building
without threads, the randomly picked new_tid that is reduced to a multiply
by 1 shifted right 32 bits, hence a constant output of 0 shows this
warning:
src/check.c: In function 'process_chk_conn':
src/check.c:1150:32: warning: array subscript [-1, 0] is outside array bounds of 'struct thread_ctx[1]' [-Warray-bounds]
In file included from include/haproxy/thread.h:28,
from include/haproxy/list.h:26,
from include/haproxy/action.h:28,
from src/check.c:31:
or this one when trying to force the test to see that it cannot be zero(!):
src/check.c: In function 'process_chk_conn':
src/check.c:1150:54: warning: array subscript [0, 0] is outside array bounds of 'struct thread_ctx[1]' [-Warray-bounds]
1150 | uint t2_act = _HA_ATOMIC_LOAD(&ha_thread_ctx[thr2].active_checks);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
include/haproxy/atomic.h:66:40: note: in definition of macro 'HA_ATOMIC_LOAD'
66 | #define HA_ATOMIC_LOAD(val) *(val)
| ^~~
src/check.c:1150:24: note: in expansion of macro '_HA_ATOMIC_LOAD'
1150 | uint t2_act = _HA_ATOMIC_LOAD(&ha_thread_ctx[thr2].active_checks);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Let's just add an ALREADY_CHECKED() statement there, no other check seems
to get rid of it. No backport is needed.
if (new_tid == tid)
continue;
+ ALREADY_CHECKED(new_tid);
+
if (check_thread_cmp_active(tid, new_tid) > 0 &&
(run_checks >= global.tune.max_checks_per_thread ||
check_thread_cmp_load(tid, new_tid) > 0)) {