The PR shows that when cfgrtl.cc:duplicate_insn_chain attempts to
update the MR_DEPENDENCE_CLIQUE information for a MEM_EXPR we can end up
accidentally dropping (e.g.) an ARRAY_REF from the MEM_EXPR and end up
replacing it with the underlying MEM_REF. This leads to an
inconsistency in the MEM_EXPR information, and could lead to wrong code.
While the walk down to the MEM_REF is necessary to update
MR_DEPENDENCE_CLIQUE, we should use the outer tree expression for the
MEM_EXPR. This patch does that.
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR rtl-optimization/114924
* cfgrtl.cc (duplicate_insn_chain): When updating MEM_EXPRs,
don't strip (e.g.) ARRAY_REFs from the final MEM_EXPR.
since MEM_EXPR is shared so make a copy and
walk to the subtree again. */
tree new_expr = unshare_expr (MEM_EXPR (*iter));
+ tree orig_new_expr = new_expr;
if (TREE_CODE (new_expr) == WITH_SIZE_EXPR)
new_expr = TREE_OPERAND (new_expr, 0);
while (handled_component_p (new_expr))
new_expr = TREE_OPERAND (new_expr, 0);
MR_DEPENDENCE_CLIQUE (new_expr) = newc;
- set_mem_expr (const_cast <rtx> (*iter), new_expr);
+ set_mem_expr (const_cast <rtx> (*iter), orig_new_expr);
}
}
}