From: Vladimir Oltean Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 12:52:37 +0000 (+0300) Subject: net: phylink: add lock for serializing concurrent pl->phydev writes with resolver X-Git-Tag: v6.17-rc6~16^2~20 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=0ba5b2f2c381dbec9ed9e4ab3ae5d3e667de0dc3;p=thirdparty%2Fkernel%2Fstable.git net: phylink: add lock for serializing concurrent pl->phydev writes with resolver Currently phylink_resolve() protects itself against concurrent phylink_bringup_phy() or phylink_disconnect_phy() calls which modify pl->phydev by relying on pl->state_mutex. The problem is that in phylink_resolve(), pl->state_mutex is in a lock inversion state with pl->phydev->lock. So pl->phydev->lock needs to be acquired prior to pl->state_mutex. But that requires dereferencing pl->phydev in the first place, and without pl->state_mutex, that is racy. Hence the reason for the extra lock. Currently it is redundant, but it will serve a functional purpose once mutex_lock(&phy->lock) will be moved outside of the mutex_lock(&pl->state_mutex) section. Another alternative considered would have been to let phylink_resolve() acquire the rtnl_mutex, which is also held when phylink_bringup_phy() and phylink_disconnect_phy() are called. But since phylink_disconnect_phy() runs under rtnl_lock(), it would deadlock with phylink_resolve() when calling flush_work(&pl->resolve). Additionally, it would have been undesirable because it would have unnecessarily blocked many other call paths as well in the entire kernel, so the smaller-scoped lock was preferred. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/aLb6puGVzR29GpPx@shell.armlinux.org.uk/ Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250904125238.193990-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski --- diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c index c7cb95aa80074..aa17ad2622fc7 100644 --- a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c @@ -67,6 +67,8 @@ struct phylink { struct timer_list link_poll; struct mutex state_mutex; + /* Serialize updates to pl->phydev with phylink_resolve() */ + struct mutex phydev_mutex; struct phylink_link_state phy_state; unsigned int phy_ib_mode; struct work_struct resolve; @@ -1591,8 +1593,11 @@ static void phylink_resolve(struct work_struct *w) struct phylink_link_state link_state; bool mac_config = false; bool retrigger = false; + struct phy_device *phy; bool cur_link_state; + mutex_lock(&pl->phydev_mutex); + phy = pl->phydev; mutex_lock(&pl->state_mutex); cur_link_state = phylink_link_is_up(pl); @@ -1626,11 +1631,11 @@ static void phylink_resolve(struct work_struct *w) /* If we have a phy, the "up" state is the union of both the * PHY and the MAC */ - if (pl->phydev) + if (phy) link_state.link &= pl->phy_state.link; /* Only update if the PHY link is up */ - if (pl->phydev && pl->phy_state.link) { + if (phy && pl->phy_state.link) { /* If the interface has changed, force a link down * event if the link isn't already down, and re-resolve. */ @@ -1694,6 +1699,7 @@ static void phylink_resolve(struct work_struct *w) queue_work(system_power_efficient_wq, &pl->resolve); } mutex_unlock(&pl->state_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&pl->phydev_mutex); } static void phylink_run_resolve(struct phylink *pl) @@ -1829,6 +1835,7 @@ struct phylink *phylink_create(struct phylink_config *config, if (!pl) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); + mutex_init(&pl->phydev_mutex); mutex_init(&pl->state_mutex); INIT_WORK(&pl->resolve, phylink_resolve); @@ -2089,6 +2096,7 @@ static int phylink_bringup_phy(struct phylink *pl, struct phy_device *phy, dev_name(&phy->mdio.dev), phy->drv->name, irq_str); kfree(irq_str); + mutex_lock(&pl->phydev_mutex); mutex_lock(&phy->lock); mutex_lock(&pl->state_mutex); pl->phydev = phy; @@ -2134,6 +2142,7 @@ static int phylink_bringup_phy(struct phylink *pl, struct phy_device *phy, mutex_unlock(&pl->state_mutex); mutex_unlock(&phy->lock); + mutex_unlock(&pl->phydev_mutex); phylink_dbg(pl, "phy: %s setting supported %*pb advertising %*pb\n", @@ -2312,6 +2321,7 @@ void phylink_disconnect_phy(struct phylink *pl) ASSERT_RTNL(); + mutex_lock(&pl->phydev_mutex); phy = pl->phydev; if (phy) { mutex_lock(&phy->lock); @@ -2321,8 +2331,11 @@ void phylink_disconnect_phy(struct phylink *pl) pl->mac_tx_clk_stop = false; mutex_unlock(&pl->state_mutex); mutex_unlock(&phy->lock); - flush_work(&pl->resolve); + } + mutex_unlock(&pl->phydev_mutex); + if (phy) { + flush_work(&pl->resolve); phy_disconnect(phy); } }