From: Michael Paquier Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2025 02:18:30 +0000 (+0900) Subject: Fix two comments in numeric.c X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=0c7f103028202cec94e12cbe45cebdb5c8fbc392;p=thirdparty%2Fpostgresql.git Fix two comments in numeric.c The comments at the top of numeric_int4_safe() and numeric_int8_safe() mentioned respectively int4_numeric() and int8_numeric(). The intention is to refer to numeric_int4() and numeric_int8(). Oversights in 4246a977bad6. Reported-by: jian he Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACJufxFfVt7Jx9_j=juxXyP-6tznN8OcvS9E-QSgp0BrD8KUgA@mail.gmail.com --- diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/numeric.c b/src/backend/utils/adt/numeric.c index 76269918593..2501007d981 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/adt/numeric.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/adt/numeric.c @@ -4359,7 +4359,7 @@ int4_numeric(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) } /* - * Internal version of int4_numeric() with support for soft error reporting. + * Internal version of numeric_int4() with support for soft error reporting. */ int32 numeric_int4_safe(Numeric num, Node *escontext) @@ -4429,7 +4429,7 @@ int8_numeric(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) } /* - * Internal version of int8_numeric() with support for soft error reporting. + * Internal version of numeric_int8() with support for soft error reporting. */ int64 numeric_int8_safe(Numeric num, Node *escontext)