From: Olivier Houchard <ohouchard@haproxy.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 13:59:44 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: CLEANUP: raw_sock: Use a better name for the constructor than __ssl_sock_deinit()
X-Git-Tag: v1.8-dev3~185
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=0d00593361b91017b894c4c7d5e24721a7838d6e;p=thirdparty%2Fhaproxy.git

CLEANUP: raw_sock: Use a better name for the constructor than __ssl_sock_deinit()

I just noticed the raw socket constructor was called __ssl_sock_deinit,
which is a bit confusing, and wrong twice, so the attached patch renames it
to __raw_sock_init, which seems more correct.
---

diff --git a/src/raw_sock.c b/src/raw_sock.c
index 8aba58d7bb..707ba55f36 100644
--- a/src/raw_sock.c
+++ b/src/raw_sock.c
@@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static struct xprt_ops raw_sock = {
 
 
 __attribute__((constructor))
-static void __ssl_sock_deinit(void)
+static void __raw_sock_init(void)
 {
 	xprt_register(XPRT_RAW, &raw_sock);
 }