From: Arthur Cohen Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 15:29:05 +0000 (+0200) Subject: gccrs: late: Start storing mappings properly in the resolver X-Git-Tag: basepoints/gcc-15~1577 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=0f0ec052b4ad1fb7250a5ad1ec00d276fdc29a09;p=thirdparty%2Fgcc.git gccrs: late: Start storing mappings properly in the resolver gcc/rust/ChangeLog: * resolve/rust-late-name-resolver-2.0.cc (Late::visit): Store mappings after having resolved them. * resolve/rust-late-name-resolver-2.0.h: Add `TypePath` visitor. --- diff --git a/gcc/rust/resolve/rust-late-name-resolver-2.0.cc b/gcc/rust/resolve/rust-late-name-resolver-2.0.cc index 3236886f37d4..5f70f5755824 100644 --- a/gcc/rust/resolve/rust-late-name-resolver-2.0.cc +++ b/gcc/rust/resolve/rust-late-name-resolver-2.0.cc @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ #include "rust-ast-full.h" #include "rust-late-name-resolver-2.0.h" #include "rust-default-resolver.h" +#include "rust-path.h" #include "rust-tyty.h" #include "rust-hir-type-check.h" @@ -121,11 +122,24 @@ Late::visit (AST::IdentifierExpr &expr) { // TODO: same thing as visit(PathInExpression) here? + tl::optional resolved = tl::nullopt; auto label = ctx.labels.get (expr.get_ident ()); auto value = ctx.values.get (expr.get_ident ()); - rust_debug ("[ARTHUR] label: %d", label ? *label : -1); - rust_debug ("[ARTHUR] value: %d", value ? *value : -1); + if (label) + resolved = label; + else if (value) + resolved = value; + // TODO: else emit error? + + ctx.map_usage (expr.get_node_id (), *resolved); + + // in the old resolver, resolutions are kept in the resolver, not the mappings + // :/ how do we deal with that? + // ctx.mappings.insert_resolved_name(expr, resolved); + + // For empty types, do we perform a lookup in ctx.types or should the + // toplevel instead insert a name in ctx.values? (like it currently does) } void @@ -136,11 +150,20 @@ Late::visit (AST::PathInExpression &expr) // do we emit it in `get`? auto label = ctx.labels.resolve_path (expr.get_segments ()); - auto value = ctx.values.resolve_path (expr.get_segments ()); +} + +void +Late::visit (AST::TypePath &type) +{ + // should we add type path resolution in `ForeverStack` directly? Since it's + // quite more complicated. + // maybe we can overload `resolve_path` to only do + // typepath-like path resolution? that sounds good + + auto resolved = ctx.types.get (type.get_segments ().back ()->as_string ()); - rust_debug ("[ARTHUR] label: %d", label ? *label : -1); - rust_debug ("[ARTHUR] value: %d", value ? *value : -1); + ctx.map_usage (type.get_node_id (), *resolved); } } // namespace Resolver2_0 diff --git a/gcc/rust/resolve/rust-late-name-resolver-2.0.h b/gcc/rust/resolve/rust-late-name-resolver-2.0.h index f54bbf2eea4f..15940d053aed 100644 --- a/gcc/rust/resolve/rust-late-name-resolver-2.0.h +++ b/gcc/rust/resolve/rust-late-name-resolver-2.0.h @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ public: // resolutions void visit (AST::IdentifierExpr &) override; void visit (AST::PathInExpression &) override; + void visit (AST::TypePath &) override; private: /* Setup Rust's builtin types (u8, i32, !...) in the resolver */