From: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:03:21 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: losetup: suggest to use modprobe rather than insmod in losetup.8
X-Git-Tag: v2.16-rc1~9
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=1de18b70fe1d3a0a6a098c34a2dd0803de315a0d;p=thirdparty%2Futil-linux.git

losetup: suggest to use modprobe rather than insmod in losetup.8

Addresses-Debian-Bug: #334796
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
---

diff --git a/mount/losetup.8 b/mount/losetup.8
index 66631b724b..f5d3e179b7 100644
--- a/mount/losetup.8
+++ b/mount/losetup.8
@@ -138,12 +138,12 @@ from determining the status of the device.
 If you are using the loadable module you must have the module loaded
 first with the command
 .IP
-# insmod loop.o
+# modprobe loop
 .LP
 Maybe also encryption modules are needed.
 .IP
-# insmod des.o
-# insmod cryptoloop.o
+# modprobe des
+# modprobe cryptoloop
 .LP
 The following commands can be used as an example of using the loop device.
 .nf