From: Filipe Manana Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 12:47:23 +0000 (+0000) Subject: btrfs: inode-item: remove unnecessary calls to btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() X-Git-Tag: v6.14-rc1~207^2~61 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=212e5f5cb8e34c93b7d50ed59421a82ad9e53caf;p=thirdparty%2Flinux.git btrfs: inode-item: remove unnecessary calls to btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() We have several places explicitly calling btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() but that is not necessarily since the target leaf came from a path that was obtained for a btree search function that modifies the btree, something like btrfs_insert_empty_item() or anything else that ends up calling btrfs_search_slot() with a value of 1 for its 'cow' argument. These just make the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove them. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode-item.c b/fs/btrfs/inode-item.c index 29572dfaf8785..448aa1a682d60 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode-item.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode-item.c @@ -298,8 +298,6 @@ static int btrfs_insert_inode_extref(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, ptr = (unsigned long)&extref->name; write_extent_buffer(path->nodes[0], name->name, ptr, name->len); - btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(trans, path->nodes[0]); - out: btrfs_free_path(path); return ret; @@ -363,8 +361,6 @@ int btrfs_insert_inode_ref(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, ptr = (unsigned long)(ref + 1); } write_extent_buffer(path->nodes[0], name->name, ptr, name->len); - btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(trans, path->nodes[0]); - out: btrfs_free_path(path); @@ -590,7 +586,6 @@ search_again: num_dec = (orig_num_bytes - extent_num_bytes); if (extent_start != 0) control->sub_bytes += num_dec; - btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(trans, leaf); } else { extent_num_bytes = btrfs_file_extent_disk_num_bytes(leaf, fi);