From: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 16:16:27 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: gpio: mvebu: don't limit pwm period/duty_cycle to UINT_MAX
X-Git-Tag: v5.12-rc1~105^2~33
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=2bee255a5ecf3213d118f22f6d8f65e4ec9101f2;p=thirdparty%2Fkernel%2Flinux.git

gpio: mvebu: don't limit pwm period/duty_cycle to UINT_MAX

PWM on/off registers are limited to UINT_MAX. However the state period
and duty_cycle fields are ns values of type u64. There is no reason to
limit them to UINT_MAX.

Reported-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
---

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
index 8673ba77af5a2..6b017854ce61b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
@@ -669,9 +669,7 @@ static void mvebu_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip,
 	regmap_read(mvpwm->regs, mvebu_pwmreg_blink_on_duration(mvpwm), &u);
 	val = (unsigned long long) u * NSEC_PER_SEC;
 	val = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(val, mvpwm->clk_rate);
-	if (val > UINT_MAX)
-		state->duty_cycle = UINT_MAX;
-	else if (val)
+	if (val)
 		state->duty_cycle = val;
 	else
 		state->duty_cycle = 1;
@@ -681,9 +679,7 @@ static void mvebu_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip,
 	val += (unsigned long long) u; /* period = on + off duration */
 	val *= NSEC_PER_SEC;
 	val = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(val, mvpwm->clk_rate);
-	if (val > UINT_MAX)
-		state->period = UINT_MAX;
-	else if (val)
+	if (val)
 		state->period = val;
 	else
 		state->period = 1;