From: Tom de Vries Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2025 15:08:44 +0000 (+0200) Subject: [gdb/testsuite] Restructure gdb.base/backtrace-through-cu-nodebug.exp X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=2f108d5e69bfc4deb3bcb40798ebb278d292c2fe;p=thirdparty%2Fbinutils-gdb.git [gdb/testsuite] Restructure gdb.base/backtrace-through-cu-nodebug.exp I noticed that the test names in test-case gdb.base/backtrace-through-cu-nodebug.exp are a bit inconsistent: ... PASS: $exp: no-cfi: maint frame-unwinder disable ARCH PASS: $exp: verify no-filters unwind fail without CFI PASS: $exp: maint flush register-cache PASS: $exp: verify unwind fail without CFI PASS: $exp: cfi: maint frame-unwinder disable ARCH PASS: $exp: Verify unwinding works based only on CFI information ... There's both a no-cfi prefix, and "without CFI". Fix this by using proc_with_prefix, getting us a consistent prefix: ... PASS: $exp: no-cfi: maint frame-unwinder disable ARCH PASS: $exp: no-cfi: verify no-filters unwind fail PASS: $exp: no-cfi: maint flush register-cache PASS: $exp: no-cfi: verify unwind fail PASS: $exp: cfi: maint frame-unwinder disable ARCH PASS: $exp: cfi: Verify unwinding works ... While we're at it, use multi_line to make a regexp more readable. Tested on aarch64-linux. Reviewed-By: Keith Seitz --- diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/backtrace-through-cu-nodebug.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/backtrace-through-cu-nodebug.exp index 36a9d10a9eb..fce6d679b89 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/backtrace-through-cu-nodebug.exp +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/backtrace-through-cu-nodebug.exp @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ proc prepare_test {has_cfi} { "${objcallerfile}" \ object [list {additional_flags=-fomit-frame-pointer \ -funwind-tables -fasynchronous-unwind-tables}]] != "" } { - untested "couldn't compile with cfi" + untested "couldn't compile" return false } } else { @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ proc prepare_test {has_cfi} { object [list {additional_flags=-fomit-frame-pointer \ -fno-unwind-tables \ -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables}]] != "" } { - untested "couldn't compile without cfi" + untested "couldn't compile" return false } } @@ -54,15 +54,12 @@ proc prepare_test {has_cfi} { clean_restart "$binfile-${extension}" - with_test_prefix "${extension}" { - - if ![runto callback] then { - fail "has_cfi=$has_cfi: Can't run to callback" - return false - } - gdb_test_no_output "maint frame-unwinder disable ARCH" - return true + if ![runto callback] then { + fail "has_cfi=$has_cfi: Can't run to callback" + return false } + gdb_test_no_output "maint frame-unwinder disable ARCH" + return true } if {[gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile2}" \ @@ -72,7 +69,11 @@ if {[gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile2}" \ return } -if { [prepare_test false] } { +proc_with_prefix no-cfi {} { + if { ![prepare_test false] } { + return + } + set re_msg \ [string_list_to_regexp \ "Required frame unwinder may have been disabled," \ @@ -85,7 +86,7 @@ if { [prepare_test false] } { $re_msg] gdb_test "bt -no-filters" \ $re_bt_no_filters \ - "verify no-filters unwind fail without CFI" + "verify no-filters unwind fail" # Flush frame cache to retrigger the message. gdb_test "maint flush register-cache" \ @@ -99,10 +100,14 @@ if { [prepare_test false] } { $re_bt_line] gdb_test "bt" \ "($re_bt|$re_bt_no_filters)" \ - "verify unwind fail without CFI" + "verify unwind fail" } -if { [prepare_test true] } { +proc_with_prefix cfi {} { + if { ![prepare_test true] } { + return + } + if { [istarget "arm*-*-*"] } { setup_kfail backtrace/31950 *-*-* } @@ -111,6 +116,12 @@ if { [prepare_test true] } { # #1 0x00000000004004e9 in caller () # #2 0x00000000004004cd in main () at ... gdb_test "bt" \ - "#0 +callback $text\r\n#1 $text in caller $text\r\n#2 $text in main $text" \ - "Verify unwinding works based only on CFI information" + [multi_line \ + "#0 +callback $text" \ + "#1 $text in caller $text" \ + "#2 $text in main $text"] \ + "Verify unwinding works" } + +no-cfi +cfi