From: Marc Kleine-Budde Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 08:18:48 +0000 (+0200) Subject: Merge patch series "can: netlink: preparation before introduction of CAN XL" X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=3064247120238f384ea53c70caad6c7c49d6c465;p=thirdparty%2Flinux.git Merge patch series "can: netlink: preparation before introduction of CAN XL" Vincent Mailhol says: An RFC was sent last weekend to kick-off the discussion of the introduction of CAN XL [1]. While the series received some positive feedback, it is far from completion. Some work is still needed to: - adjust the nesting of the IFLA_CAN_XL_DATA_BITTIMING_CONST in the netlink interface - add the CAN XL PWM configuration and this TODO list may grow if more feedback is received. Regardless of this, the RFC started with a tree wide refactor followed by a set of trivial patches to do some clean-up and some renaming in preparation of the introduction of CAN XL. This series just contains those preparation patch which were cherry picked from the RFC and rebased on of top of linux-can-next/main: - the first patch is purely cosmetic and fixes a trivial tabulation mistake. - the last three patches do some renaming: both the CAN FD and the CAN XL have databittiming parameters. In order not to get confused once CAN XL will be introduced, many symbols are modified to explicitly add CAN FD in their names. The goal is to have those merged first to remove some overhead from the netlink CAN XL main series before tacking care of the other comments. [1] [RFC] can: netlink: add CAN XL Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/20241110155902.72807-16-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241112165118.586613-7-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr [mkl: adjusted commit message, as patch 1 of the original series is already mainline] Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde --- 3064247120238f384ea53c70caad6c7c49d6c465