From: Jan Beulich Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 08:34:10 +0000 (+0100) Subject: x86-64: refuse "high" 8-bit regs with .insn and VEX/XOP/EVEX encodings X-Git-Tag: binutils-2_42~429 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=3e4a511bee874d73f9f749cc8cf3bc748b4d47b5;p=thirdparty%2Fbinutils-gdb.git x86-64: refuse "high" 8-bit regs with .insn and VEX/XOP/EVEX encodings Much like REX, those encodings - if permitting 8-bit regs at all, i.e. only starting with APX - permit use of "new" 8-bit registers only. %ah, %ch, %dh, and %bh cannot be encoded and hence should be rejected. Permit their use outside of 64-bit code though, as "new" registers simply don't exist there. --- diff --git a/gas/config/tc-i386.c b/gas/config/tc-i386.c index 6e2f6e51457..cdd3b55c655 100644 --- a/gas/config/tc-i386.c +++ b/gas/config/tc-i386.c @@ -11485,6 +11485,16 @@ s_insn (int dummy ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED) for (j = i.imm_operands; j < i.operands; ++j) { + /* Look for 8-bit operands that use old registers. */ + if (i.vec_encoding != vex_encoding_default + && flag_code == CODE_64BIT + && i.types[j].bitfield.class == Reg + && i.types[j].bitfield.byte + && !(i.op[j].regs->reg_flags & RegRex64) + && i.op[j].regs->reg_num > 3) + as_bad (_("can't encode register '%s%s' with VEX/XOP/EVEX"), + register_prefix, i.op[j].regs->reg_name); + i.types[j].bitfield.instance = InstanceNone; if (operand_type_check (i.types[j], disp))