From: Dan Carpenter Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 10:53:41 +0000 (+0300) Subject: iocost: don't nest spin_lock_irq in ioc_weight_write() X-Git-Tag: v5.4-rc6~10^2 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=41591a51f00d2dc7bb9dc6e9bedf56c5cf6f2392;p=thirdparty%2Fkernel%2Flinux.git iocost: don't nest spin_lock_irq in ioc_weight_write() This code causes a static analysis warning: block/blk-iocost.c:2113 ioc_weight_write() error: double lock 'irq' We disable IRQs in blkg_conf_prep() and re-enable them in blkg_conf_finish(). IRQ disable/enable should not be nested because that means the IRQs will be enabled at the first unlock instead of the second one. Fixes: 7caa47151ab2 ("blkcg: implement blk-iocost") Acked-by: Tejun Heo Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- diff --git a/block/blk-iocost.c b/block/blk-iocost.c index 2a3db80c1dce7..a7ed434eae038 100644 --- a/block/blk-iocost.c +++ b/block/blk-iocost.c @@ -2110,10 +2110,10 @@ static ssize_t ioc_weight_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf, goto einval; } - spin_lock_irq(&iocg->ioc->lock); + spin_lock(&iocg->ioc->lock); iocg->cfg_weight = v; weight_updated(iocg); - spin_unlock_irq(&iocg->ioc->lock); + spin_unlock(&iocg->ioc->lock); blkg_conf_finish(&ctx); return nbytes;