From: Greg Kroah-Hartman Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 18:03:37 +0000 (+0100) Subject: 4.13-stable patches X-Git-Tag: v3.18.82~17 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=464e52246ac507192528c07f951ac282fe00174b;p=thirdparty%2Fkernel%2Fstable-queue.git 4.13-stable patches added patches: edac-sb_edac-don-t-create-a-second-memory-controller-if-ha1-is-not-present.patch --- diff --git a/queue-4.13/edac-sb_edac-don-t-create-a-second-memory-controller-if-ha1-is-not-present.patch b/queue-4.13/edac-sb_edac-don-t-create-a-second-memory-controller-if-ha1-is-not-present.patch new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..da57ca7624a --- /dev/null +++ b/queue-4.13/edac-sb_edac-don-t-create-a-second-memory-controller-if-ha1-is-not-present.patch @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@ +From 15cc3ae001873845b5d842e212478a6570c7d938 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Qiuxu Zhuo +Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 18:42:14 +0800 +Subject: EDAC, sb_edac: Don't create a second memory controller if HA1 is not present + +From: Qiuxu Zhuo + +commit 15cc3ae001873845b5d842e212478a6570c7d938 upstream. + +Yi Zhang reported the following failure on a 2-socket Haswell (E5-2603v3) +server (DELL PowerEdge 730xd): + + EDAC sbridge: Some needed devices are missing + EDAC MC: Removed device 0 for sb_edac.c Haswell SrcID#0_Ha#0: DEV 0000:7f:12.0 + EDAC MC: Removed device 1 for sb_edac.c Haswell SrcID#1_Ha#0: DEV 0000:ff:12.0 + EDAC sbridge: Couldn't find mci handler + EDAC sbridge: Couldn't find mci handler + EDAC sbridge: Failed to register device with error -19. + +The refactored sb_edac driver creates the IMC1 (the 2nd memory +controller) if any IMC1 device is present. In this case only +HA1_TA of IMC1 was present, but the driver expected to find +HA1/HA1_TM/HA1_TAD[0-3] devices too, leading to the above failure. + +The document [1] says the 'E5-2603 v3' CPU has 4 memory channels max. Yi +Zhang inserted one DIMM per channel for each CPU, and did random error +address injection test with this patch: + + 4024 addresses fell in TOLM hole area + 12715 addresses fell in CPU_SrcID#0_Ha#0_Chan#0_DIMM#0 + 12774 addresses fell in CPU_SrcID#0_Ha#0_Chan#1_DIMM#0 + 12798 addresses fell in CPU_SrcID#0_Ha#0_Chan#2_DIMM#0 + 12913 addresses fell in CPU_SrcID#0_Ha#0_Chan#3_DIMM#0 + 12674 addresses fell in CPU_SrcID#1_Ha#0_Chan#0_DIMM#0 + 12686 addresses fell in CPU_SrcID#1_Ha#0_Chan#1_DIMM#0 + 12882 addresses fell in CPU_SrcID#1_Ha#0_Chan#2_DIMM#0 + 12934 addresses fell in CPU_SrcID#1_Ha#0_Chan#3_DIMM#0 + 106400 addresses were injected totally. + +The test result shows that all the 4 channels belong to IMC0 per CPU, so +the server really only has one IMC per CPU. + +In the 1st page of chapter 2 in datasheet [2], it also says 'E5-2600 v3' +implements either one or two IMCs. For CPUs with one IMC, IMC1 is not +used and should be ignored. + +Thus, do not create a second memory controller if the key HA1 is absent. + +[1] http://ark.intel.com/products/83349/Intel-Xeon-Processor-E5-2603-v3-15M-Cache-1_60-GHz +[2] https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/datasheets/xeon-e5-v3-datasheet-vol-2.pdf + +Reported-and-tested-by: Yi Zhang +Signed-off-by: Qiuxu Zhuo +Cc: Tony Luck +Cc: linux-edac +Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170913104214.7325-1-qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com +[ Massage commit message. ] +Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov +Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman + +--- + drivers/edac/sb_edac.c | 9 ++++++++- + 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) + +--- a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c ++++ b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c +@@ -455,6 +455,7 @@ static const struct pci_id_table pci_dev + static const struct pci_id_descr pci_dev_descr_ibridge[] = { + /* Processor Home Agent */ + { PCI_DESCR(PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_IBRIDGE_IMC_HA0, 0, IMC0) }, ++ { PCI_DESCR(PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_IBRIDGE_IMC_HA1, 1, IMC1) }, + + /* Memory controller */ + { PCI_DESCR(PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_IBRIDGE_IMC_HA0_TA, 0, IMC0) }, +@@ -465,7 +466,6 @@ static const struct pci_id_descr pci_dev + { PCI_DESCR(PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_IBRIDGE_IMC_HA0_TAD3, 0, IMC0) }, + + /* Optional, mode 2HA */ +- { PCI_DESCR(PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_IBRIDGE_IMC_HA1, 1, IMC1) }, + { PCI_DESCR(PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_IBRIDGE_IMC_HA1_TA, 1, IMC1) }, + { PCI_DESCR(PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_IBRIDGE_IMC_HA1_RAS, 1, IMC1) }, + { PCI_DESCR(PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_IBRIDGE_IMC_HA1_TAD0, 1, IMC1) }, +@@ -2260,6 +2260,13 @@ static int sbridge_get_onedevice(struct + next_imc: + sbridge_dev = get_sbridge_dev(bus, dev_descr->dom, multi_bus, sbridge_dev); + if (!sbridge_dev) { ++ /* If the HA1 wasn't found, don't create EDAC second memory controller */ ++ if (dev_descr->dom == IMC1 && devno != 1) { ++ edac_dbg(0, "Skip IMC1: %04x:%04x (since HA1 was absent)\n", ++ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, dev_descr->dev_id); ++ pci_dev_put(pdev); ++ return 0; ++ } + + if (dev_descr->dom == SOCK) + goto out_imc; diff --git a/queue-4.13/series b/queue-4.13/series index a22ad9862f4..ab4200fa878 100644 --- a/queue-4.13/series +++ b/queue-4.13/series @@ -40,3 +40,4 @@ mac80211-use-constant-time-comparison-with-keys.patch mac80211-don-t-compare-tkip-tx-mic-key-in-reinstall-prevention.patch usb-usbtest-fix-null-pointer-dereference.patch input-ims-psu-check-if-cdc-union-descriptor-is-sane.patch +edac-sb_edac-don-t-create-a-second-memory-controller-if-ha1-is-not-present.patch