From: Jason Merrill Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 01:39:03 +0000 (-0400) Subject: re PR c++/60532 (r208573 causes Firefox build failure) X-Git-Tag: releases/gcc-4.9.0~445 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=47b5d284dd6aa3281f79d973e3194ab9d6990a45;p=thirdparty%2Fgcc.git re PR c++/60532 (r208573 causes Firefox build failure) PR c++/60532 PR c++/58678 * search.c (get_pure_virtuals): Handle abstract dtor here. (dfs_get_pure_virtuals): Not here. From-SVN: r208586 --- diff --git a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog index b752ebe914f0..ca2f8c1270df 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog @@ -1,5 +1,10 @@ 2014-03-14 Jason Merrill + PR c++/60532 + PR c++/58678 + * search.c (get_pure_virtuals): Handle abstract dtor here. + (dfs_get_pure_virtuals): Not here. + PR c++/58678 * search.c (dfs_get_pure_virtuals): Treat the destructor of an abstract class as pure. diff --git a/gcc/cp/search.c b/gcc/cp/search.c index 66c6df5215e7..d99e18215faf 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/search.c +++ b/gcc/cp/search.c @@ -2096,22 +2096,6 @@ dfs_get_pure_virtuals (tree binfo, void *data) if (DECL_PURE_VIRTUAL_P (BV_FN (virtuals))) vec_safe_push (CLASSTYPE_PURE_VIRTUALS (type), BV_FN (virtuals)); } - /* Treat a virtual destructor in an abstract class as pure even if it - isn't declared as pure; there is no way it would be called through the - vtable except during construction, which causes undefined behavior. */ - if (binfo == TYPE_BINFO (type) - && CLASSTYPE_PURE_VIRTUALS (type) - && TYPE_HAS_NONTRIVIAL_DESTRUCTOR (type)) - { - tree dtor = CLASSTYPE_DESTRUCTORS (type); - if (DECL_VIRTUAL_P (dtor) && !DECL_PURE_VIRTUAL_P (dtor)) - { - tree clone; - DECL_PURE_VIRTUAL_P (dtor) = true; - FOR_EACH_CLONE (clone, dtor) - DECL_PURE_VIRTUAL_P (clone) = true; - } - } return NULL_TREE; } @@ -2131,6 +2115,22 @@ get_pure_virtuals (tree type) which it is a primary base will contain vtable entries for the pure virtuals in the base class. */ dfs_walk_once (TYPE_BINFO (type), NULL, dfs_get_pure_virtuals, type); + + /* Treat a virtual destructor in an abstract class as pure even if it + isn't declared as pure; there is no way it would be called through the + vtable except during construction, which causes undefined behavior. */ + if (CLASSTYPE_PURE_VIRTUALS (type) + && TYPE_HAS_NONTRIVIAL_DESTRUCTOR (type)) + { + tree dtor = CLASSTYPE_DESTRUCTORS (type); + if (dtor && DECL_VIRTUAL_P (dtor) && !DECL_PURE_VIRTUAL_P (dtor)) + { + tree clone; + DECL_PURE_VIRTUAL_P (dtor) = true; + FOR_EACH_CLONE (clone, dtor) + DECL_PURE_VIRTUAL_P (clone) = true; + } + } } /* Debug info for C++ classes can get very large; try to avoid diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/abstract6.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/abstract6.C new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..ceba1a60b6d6 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/abstract6.C @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +// PR c++/60532 + +class A +{ + ~A (); +}; +class B : A +{ + virtual void m () = 0; +};