From: Matthew Malcomson Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 18:10:56 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Fix c64-ifunc-2 test X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=49432a1df068164f265ab9c6bf4d86f5e984762c;p=thirdparty%2Fbinutils-gdb.git Fix c64-ifunc-2 test This was newly failing because it was checking for a value *without* the LSB set. In a recent commit we have fixed the bug which lost the LSB, and that caused this test to fail. Here we use the new testsuite implementation to test for "one plus the location" rather than "one of the values A, B, C, ...", which is a better representation of what we're trying to check. --- diff --git a/ld/testsuite/ld-aarch64/c64-ifunc-2.d b/ld/testsuite/ld-aarch64/c64-ifunc-2.d index b87908b27a4..2954f67b0c5 100644 --- a/ld/testsuite/ld-aarch64/c64-ifunc-2.d +++ b/ld/testsuite/ld-aarch64/c64-ifunc-2.d @@ -4,10 +4,17 @@ #objdump: -dw #source: ifunc-2.s +#record: INDIRECT_LOC FOO_LOCATION #... -0+(130|1a0|1c8|1e0) : +0+([0-9a-f]{3}).*0x([0-9a-f]{3})@plt>: #... -[ \t0-9a-f]+:[ \t0-9a-f]+bl[ \t0-9a-f]+<\*ABS\*\+0x(130|1a0|1c8|1e0)@plt> +Disassembly of section \.text: + +#check: FOO_LOC string tolower $FOO_LOCATION +#check: INDIRECT_POS format %x [expr "0x$INDIRECT_LOC + 1"] +0+FOO_LOC : +#... +[ \t0-9a-f]+:[ \t0-9a-f]+bl[ \t0-9a-f]+<\*ABS\*\+0xFOO_LOC@plt> [ \t0-9a-f]+:[ \t0-9a-f]+adrp[ \t]+c0, 0 <.*> -[ \t0-9a-f]+:[ \t0-9a-f]+add[ \t]+c0, c0, #0x(120|190|1b8|1d0) +[ \t0-9a-f]+:[ \t0-9a-f]+add[ \t]+c0, c0, #0xINDIRECT_POS #pass