From: Miss Skeleton (bot) <31488909+miss-islington@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 17:05:50 +0000 (-0700)
Subject: bpo-41584: clarify when the reflected method of a binary arithemtic operator is calle... 
X-Git-Tag: v3.9.1rc1~194
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4aad1e5770fab72908f922a7876075d3d5a7c0d0;p=thirdparty%2FPython%2Fcpython.git

bpo-41584: clarify when the reflected method of a binary arithemtic operator is called (GH-22505)

(cherry picked from commit d02d824e05e2cb86f4df381be18832e76e2c475f)

Co-authored-by: Brett Cannon <brett@python.org>
---

diff --git a/Doc/reference/datamodel.rst b/Doc/reference/datamodel.rst
index fc304a191a31..354c6ce53f76 100644
--- a/Doc/reference/datamodel.rst
+++ b/Doc/reference/datamodel.rst
@@ -2376,10 +2376,11 @@ left undefined.
 
    .. note::
 
-      If the right operand's type is a subclass of the left operand's type and that
-      subclass provides the reflected method for the operation, this method will be
-      called before the left operand's non-reflected method.  This behavior allows
-      subclasses to override their ancestors' operations.
+      If the right operand's type is a subclass of the left operand's type and
+      that subclass provides a different implementation of the reflected method
+      for the operation, this method will be called before the left operand's
+      non-reflected method. This behavior allows subclasses to override their
+      ancestors' operations.
 
 
 .. method:: object.__iadd__(self, other)
@@ -2778,6 +2779,6 @@ An example of an asynchronous context manager class::
    method—that will instead have the opposite effect of explicitly
    *blocking* such fallback.
 
-.. [#] For operands of the same type, it is assumed that if the non-reflected method
-   (such as :meth:`__add__`) fails the operation is not supported, which is why the
-   reflected method is not called.
+.. [#] For operands of the same type, it is assumed that if the non-reflected
+   method -- such as :meth:`__add__` -- fails then the overall operation is not
+   supported, which is why the reflected method is not called.