From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 08:06:32 +0000 (+0300)
Subject: drm/nouveau/fifo: small cleanup in nvkm_chan_cctx_get()
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4b1f230c875d05186604b61a28e6c7db6bd1424d;p=thirdparty%2Fkernel%2Flinux.git

drm/nouveau/fifo: small cleanup in nvkm_chan_cctx_get()

"&chan->cgrp->mutex" and "&cgrp->mutex" are the same thing.  Use
"&cgrp->mutex" consistently.  It looks nicer and it silences a
Smatch static checker warning.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/aBHaCM66pXaP84ei@stanley.mountain
Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
---

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/chan.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/chan.c
index 7d4716dcd5129..f5cd7f7c48b44 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/chan.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/chan.c
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ nvkm_chan_cctx_get(struct nvkm_chan *chan, struct nvkm_engn *engn, struct nvkm_c
 	if (cctx) {
 		refcount_inc(&cctx->refs);
 		*pcctx = cctx;
-		mutex_unlock(&chan->cgrp->mutex);
+		mutex_unlock(&cgrp->mutex);
 		return 0;
 	}