From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:59:47 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: opts.c (common_handle_option): Treat -Wstrict-overflow (with no argument) like -Wstri... 
X-Git-Tag: releases/gcc-4.3.0~6344
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4d4362c8da9329e33ce27f67654af427e7d5c275;p=thirdparty%2Fgcc.git

opts.c (common_handle_option): Treat -Wstrict-overflow (with no argument) like -Wstrict-overflow=2.

	* opts.c (common_handle_option): Treat -Wstrict-overflow (with no
	argument) like -Wstrict-overflow=2.
	* doc/invoke.texi (Warning Options): Update documentation.

From-SVN: r122753
---

diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index 7bd6d741ea15..31d871a7ee1f 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2007-03-09  Ian Lance Taylor  <iant@google.com>
+
+	* opts.c (common_handle_option): Treat -Wstrict-overflow (with no
+	argument) like -Wstrict-overflow=2.
+	* doc/invoke.texi (Warning Options): Update documentation.
+
 2007-03-09  Dirk Mueller  <dmueller@suse.de>
 
 	PR c++/17946
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index 987988441746..df9b160a7a65 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@ -3018,17 +3018,17 @@ warning levels are defined.
 @item -Wstrict-overflow=1
 Warn about cases which are both questionable and easy to avoid.  For
 example: @code{x + 1 > x}; with @option{-fstrict-overflow}, the
-compiler will simplify this to @code{1}.  @option{-Wstrict-overflow}
-(with no level) is the same as @option{-Wstrict-overflow=1}.  This
-level of @option{-Wstrict-overflow} is enabled by @option{-Wall};
-higher levels are not, and must be explicitly requested.
+compiler will simplify this to @code{1}.  This level of
+@option{-Wstrict-overflow} is enabled by @option{-Wall}; higher levels
+are not, and must be explicitly requested.
 
 @item -Wstrict-overflow=2
 Also warn about other cases where a comparison is simplified to a
 constant.  For example: @code{abs (x) >= 0}.  This can only be
 simplified when @option{-fstrict-overflow} is in effect, because
 @code{abs (INT_MIN)} overflows to @code{INT_MIN}, which is less than
-zero.
+zero.  @option{-Wstrict-overflow} (with no level) is the same as
+@option{-Wstrict-overflow=2}.
 
 @item -Wstrict-overflow=3
 Also warn about other cases where a comparison is simplified.  For
diff --git a/gcc/opts.c b/gcc/opts.c
index d3aea98ce986..ecbc9a39cbba 100644
--- a/gcc/opts.c
+++ b/gcc/opts.c
@@ -1094,6 +1094,11 @@ common_handle_option (size_t scode, const char *arg, int value,
       break;
 
     case OPT_Wstrict_overflow:
+      warn_strict_overflow = (value
+			      ? (int) WARN_STRICT_OVERFLOW_CONDITIONAL
+			      : 0);
+      break;
+
     case OPT_Wstrict_overflow_:
       warn_strict_overflow = value;
       break;